Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Speeding Up Sparsification using Inner Product Search Data Structures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.03209 v1 pith:KV7HFWCC submitted 2022-04-07 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords datastructurestimedifferentomegaproblemprocessalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a general framework that utilizes different efficient data structures to improve various sparsification problems involving an iterative process. We also provide insights and characterization for different iterative process, and answer that when should we use which data structures in what type of problem. We obtain improved running time for the following problems. * For constructing linear-sized spectral sparsifier (Batson, Spielman and Srivastava, 2012), all the existing deterministic algorithms require $\Omega(d^4)$ time. In this work, we provide the first deterministic algorithm that breaks that barrier which runs in $O(d^{\omega+1})$ time, where $\omega$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. * For one-sided Kadison-Singer-typed discrepancy problem, we give fast algorithms for both small and large number of iterations. * For experimental design problem, we speed up a key swapping process. In the heart of our work is the design of a variety of different inner product search data structures that have efficient initialization, query and update time, compatible to dimensionality reduction and robust against adaptive adversary.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accept More, Reject Less: Reducing up to 19% Unnecessary Desk-Rejections over 11 Years of ICLR Data

    cs.DS 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LP-rounding selection rule for per-author submission limits desk-rejects up to 19.23% fewer ICLR papers than the standard ID-order policy.

Pith tools