Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SATA: Sparsity-Aware Training Accelerator for Spiking Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.05422 v3 pith:FIBPXF6L submitted 2022-04-11 cs.NE cs.AR

classification cs.NEcs.AR
keywords trainingenergysnnsannssataacceleratoralgorithmcost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have gained huge attention as a potential energy-efficient alternative to conventional Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) due to their inherent high-sparsity activation. Recently, SNNs with backpropagation through time (BPTT) have achieved a higher accuracy result on image recognition tasks than other SNN training algorithms. Despite the success from the algorithm perspective, prior works neglect the evaluation of the hardware energy overheads of BPTT due to the lack of a hardware evaluation platform for this SNN training algorithm. Moreover, although SNNs have long been seen as an energy-efficient counterpart of ANNs, a quantitative comparison between the training cost of SNNs and ANNs is missing. To address the aforementioned issues, in this work, we introduce SATA (Sparsity-Aware Training Accelerator), a BPTT-based training accelerator for SNNs. The proposed SATA provides a simple and re-configurable systolic-based accelerator architecture, which makes it easy to analyze the training energy for BPTT-based SNN training algorithms. By utilizing the sparsity, SATA increases its computation energy efficiency by $5.58 \times$ compared to the one without using sparsity. Based on SATA, we show quantitative analyses of the energy efficiency of SNN training and compare the training cost of SNNs and ANNs. The results show that, on Eyeriss-like systolic-based architecture, SNNs consume $1.27\times$ more total energy with sparsities when compared to ANNs. We find that such high training energy cost is from time-repetitive convolution operations and data movements during backpropagation. Moreover, to propel the future SNN training algorithm design, we provide several observations on energy efficiency for different SNN-specific training parameters and propose an energy estimation framework for SNN training. Code for our framework is made publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools