REVIEW 2 cited by
A Protocol for Validating Social Navigation Policies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Enabling socially acceptable behavior for situated agents is a major goal of recent robotics research. Robots should not only operate safely around humans, but also abide by complex social norms. A key challenge for developing socially-compliant policies is measuring the quality of their behavior. Social behavior is enormously complex, making it difficult to create reliable metrics to gauge the performance of algorithms. In this paper, we propose a protocol for social navigation benchmarking that defines a set of canonical social navigation scenarios and an in-situ metric for evaluating performance on these scenarios using questionnaires. Our experiments show this protocol is realistic, scalable, and repeatable across runs and physical spaces. Our protocol can be replicated verbatim or it can be used to define a social navigation benchmark for novel scenarios. Our goal is to introduce a protocol for benchmarking social scenarios that is homogeneous and comparable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Narrate2Nav: Real-Time Visual Navigation with Implicit Language Reasoning in Human-Centric Environments
Narrate2Nav uses Barlow Twins alignment to distill language-based reasoning from a large teacher into a small RGB-only navigation model, reporting lower trajectory error and higher goal-reaching success than four baselines.
-
Social-LLaVA: Enhancing Robot Navigation through Human-Language Reasoning in Social Spaces
A new 40K-pair vision-language dataset for social navigation and a fine-tuned VLM that reportedly beats GPT-4V and Gemini in human-judged scene reasoning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.