Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mean oscillation gradient estimates for elliptic systems in divergence form with VMO coefficients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.12958 v1 pith:U37Q2WKN submitted 2022-04-27 math.AP

classification math.AP
keywords nablaalphabetacontinuityomegathendinidivergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We consider gradient estimates for $H^1$ solutions of linear elliptic systems in divergence form $\partial_\alpha(A_{ij}^{\alpha\beta} \partial_\beta u^j) = 0$. It is known that the Dini continuity of coefficient matrix $A = (A_{ij}^{\alpha\beta}) $ is essential for the differentiability of solutions. We prove the following results: (a) If $A$ satisfies a condition slightly weaker than Dini continuity but stronger than belonging to VMO, namely that the $L^2$ mean oscillation $\omega_{A,2}$ of $A$ satisfies \[ X_{A,2} := \limsup_{r\rightarrow 0} r \int_r^2 \frac{\omega_{A,2}(t)}{t^2} \exp\Big(C_* \int_{t}^R \frac{\omega_{A,2}(s)}{s}\,ds\Big)\,dt < \infty, \] where $C_*$ is a positive constant depending only on the dimensions and the ellipticity, then $\nabla u \in BMO$. (b) If $X_{A,2} = 0$, then $\nabla u \in VMO$. (c) If $A \in VMO$ and if $\nabla u \in L^\infty$, then $\nabla u \in VMO$. (d) Finally, examples satisfying $X_{A,2} = 0$ are given showing that it is not possible to prove the boundedness of $\nabla u$ in statement (b), nor the continuity of $\nabla u$ in statement (c).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools