REVIEW
How Do Captions Affect Visualization Reading?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Captions help readers better understand visualizations. However, if the visualization is intended to communicate specific features, should the caption be statistical, and focus on specific values, or perceptual, and focus on general patterns? Prior work has shown that when captions mention visually salient features, readers tend to recall those features. Still, we lack explicit guidelines for how to compose the appropriate caption. Further, what if the author wishes to emphasize a less salient feature? In this paper, we study how the visual salience of the feature described in a caption, and the semantic level of the caption description, affect a reader's takeaways from line charts. For each single- or multi-line chart, we generate 4 captions that 1) describe either the primary or secondary salient feature in a chart, and 2) describe the feature either at the statistical or perceptual levels. We then show participants random chart-caption pairs and record their takeaways. We find that the primary salient feature is more memorable for single-line charts when the caption is expressed at the statistical level; for primary and secondary features in multi-line charts, the perceptual level is more memorable. We also find that many readers will tend to recall y-axis numerical values when a caption is present.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.