pith. sign in

arxiv: 2206.03816 · v1 · submitted 2022-06-08 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

bf H(curl²) conforming element for Maxwell's transmission eigenvalue problem using fixed-point approach

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords Maxwell transmission eigenvalue problemH(curl²) conforming elementsfixed-point formulationfinite element methoderror estimateseigenvalue approximationelectromagnetic eigenvalues
0
0 comments X

The pith

New H(curl²) conforming elements with a fixed-point formulation deliver optimal error estimates for Maxwell transmission eigenvalues.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops H(curl²) conforming finite elements to discretize Maxwell's transmission eigenvalue problem for both real and complex eigenvalues. It applies these elements to a fixed-point weak formulation and proves that the resulting numerical eigenvalues and eigenfunctions converge at optimal rates. The error bounds are given in the H(curl²) norm for the eigenfunctions and the H(curl) semi-norm. A reader would care because transmission eigenvalues appear in inverse scattering and material identification, where reliable numerical accuracy matters for practical computation. The analysis supplies the theoretical rates that justify using the new elements on successively refined meshes.

Core claim

Using newly developed H(curl²) conforming elements on the fixed-point weak formulation of Maxwell's transmission eigenvalue problem, with reasonable assumptions, the optimal error estimates for numerical eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are established in the H(curl²)-norm and H(curl)-semi-norm.

What carries the argument

H(curl²) conforming finite elements applied to the fixed-point weak formulation of the transmission eigenvalue problem.

If this is right

  • Optimal error estimates apply to both real and complex eigenvalues.
  • Eigenfunctions converge at optimal order in the H(curl²) norm.
  • Eigenvalues achieve optimal accuracy from the fixed-point discretization.
  • The estimates cover the H(curl) semi-norm as well.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could support more accurate forward simulations in electromagnetic scattering where transmission eigenvalues determine unknown material coefficients.
  • The same elements might be tested on related curl-curl eigenvalue problems arising in cavity resonators.
  • Implementation on adaptive meshes could be examined to see whether the conformity properties preserve the predicted rates in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The fixed-point weak formulation admits reasonable assumptions that permit derivation of the optimal error estimates.

What would settle it

Numerical experiments on a sequence of refined meshes in which the observed convergence rate for eigenvalues or eigenfunctions falls below the predicted optimal order would falsify the claims.

read the original abstract

Using newly developed ${\bf H}(\mathrm{curl}^2)$ conforming elements, we solve the Maxwell's transmission eigenvalue problem. Both real and complex eigenvalues are considered. Based on the fixed-point weak formulation with reasonable assumptions, the optimal error estimates for numerical eigenvalues and eigenfunctions (in the ${\bf H}(\mathrm{curl}^2)$-norm and ${\bf H}(\mathrm{curl})$-semi-norm) are established.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops new H(curl²)-conforming finite elements to discretize Maxwell's transmission eigenvalue problem for both real and complex eigenvalues. It employs a fixed-point weak formulation and claims to prove optimal error estimates for the computed eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in the H(curl²)-norm and H(curl)-semi-norm.

Significance. If the error analysis is complete, the work supplies a conforming discretization and convergence theory for a non-self-adjoint eigenvalue problem that arises in scattering theory, which could enable reliable numerical computation of transmission eigenvalues with optimal rates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and fixed-point weak formulation] Abstract and the fixed-point formulation section: the headline result (optimal error estimates) is stated to hold only 'with reasonable assumptions,' yet no explicit list or verification of those assumptions (compactness of the solution operator, spectral gap, interface regularity, etc.) is provided; without this, the applicability of the error analysis to the transmission problem cannot be confirmed.
  2. [Error estimates] Error analysis section (presumably §4–5): the derivation of the optimal rates in the H(curl²)-norm and H(curl)-semi-norm must be shown to rest only on the listed assumptions and not on additional hidden regularity or mesh conditions; the manuscript should include a dedicated paragraph verifying that the Maxwell transmission problem satisfies the hypotheses of the abstract error theorem.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Throughout] Notation: ensure that the boldface convention for vector fields is applied uniformly in all displayed equations and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The suggestions highlight opportunities to improve clarity regarding the assumptions underlying our error analysis. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and fixed-point weak formulation] Abstract and the fixed-point formulation section: the headline result (optimal error estimates) is stated to hold only 'with reasonable assumptions,' yet no explicit list or verification of those assumptions (compactness of the solution operator, spectral gap, interface regularity, etc.) is provided; without this, the applicability of the error analysis to the transmission problem cannot be confirmed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit enumeration of the assumptions would strengthen the presentation and allow readers to verify applicability more readily. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (approximately §2.3) immediately after the fixed-point formulation. This subsection will list all hypotheses required by the abstract error theorem, including compactness of the solution operator, existence of a spectral gap, and sufficient interface regularity. Brief justifications will be supplied, drawing on standard results for the Maxwell transmission problem under the usual physical assumptions (smooth interfaces, positive bounded material coefficients). These additions will make the scope of the error estimates explicit without altering the analysis itself. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Error estimates] Error analysis section (presumably §4–5): the derivation of the optimal rates in the H(curl²)-norm and H(curl)-semi-norm must be shown to rest only on the listed assumptions and not on additional hidden regularity or mesh conditions; the manuscript should include a dedicated paragraph verifying that the Maxwell transmission problem satisfies the hypotheses of the abstract error theorem.

    Authors: We accept this recommendation. A new paragraph will be added at the start of the error-analysis section (new §4.1) that systematically checks each hypothesis of the abstract theorem against the Maxwell transmission eigenvalue problem. The paragraph will confirm that the subsequent proofs invoke only the listed assumptions together with standard mesh quasi-uniformity; no supplementary regularity or mesh restrictions are used. Cross-references will be inserted in §§4–5 to ensure every step is traceable to these hypotheses. This change addresses the concern directly while preserving the existing proofs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard error analysis under stated assumptions

full rationale

The derivation relies on a fixed-point weak formulation to obtain optimal error estimates for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in the H(curl²) and H(curl) norms. This is the conventional structure of finite-element convergence proofs for transmission eigenvalue problems: the estimates follow from approximation properties of the discrete spaces once the weak form and its compactness/spectral properties are assumed. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or depends on a self-citation chain whose validity is internal to the paper. The assumptions are external to the numerical result and the analysis remains self-contained against standard a priori theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the fixed-point weak formulation and the construction of new conforming elements, whose details and assumptions are referenced but not specified in the abstract; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fixed-point weak formulation with reasonable assumptions
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for establishing optimal error estimates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1110 out tokens · 24587 ms · 2026-05-24T11:08:24.239709+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    An and J

    J. An and J. Shen. A spectral-element method for transmiss ion eigenvalue problems. J. Sci. Comput., 57(2013), 670-68 8

  2. [2]

    An and Z

    J. An and Z. Zhang. An efficient spectral-Galerkin approxim ation and error analysis for Maxwell transmission eigenval ue problems in spherical geometries. J. Sci. Comput., 75(2018 ), 157-181

  3. [3]

    Babuska, J

    I. Babuska, J. Osborn. Eigenvalue Problems, in: P .G. Ciar let, J. L. Lions, (Ed.), Finite Element Methods (Part 1), Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol.2, Elsevier Science Pu blishers, North-Holand, 1991, pp. 640-787

  4. [4]

    S. C. Brenner, J. Sun, and L. Sung. Hodge decomposition met hods for a quad-curl problem on planar domains. J. Sci. Comput., 73(2017), 495-513

  5. [5]

    Brezzi and M

    F. Brezzi and M. Fortin. Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Me thods, vol. 15, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991

  6. [6]

    Cakoni, M

    F. Cakoni, M. Cayoren, and D. Colton. Transmission eigenv alues and the nondestructive testing of dielectrics. Inver se Problems, 24(2008), 065016

  7. [7]

    Cakoni, H

    F. Cakoni, H. Haddar. On the existence of transmission eig envalues in an inhomogenous medium, Appl. Anal., 88(2009), pp. 475-493

  8. [8]

    Cakoni, D

    F. Cakoni, D. Gintides, and H. Haddar. The existence of an i nfinite discrete set of transmission eigenvalues. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 42(2010), 237-255. 14 T able 6 The numerical eigenvalues by lowest order element on the L-s haped-domain with h0 = √ 2 16 . N = [16 0; 0 16 + x1 − x2] N = [16 x1; x1 2] j h k j,h rh |f ′ h(τj,h)| j h k j,h rh |f ′ h(τj,h)| 1 h...

  9. [9]

    Cakoni, D

    F. Cakoni, D. Coltionk P. Monk, and J. Sun. The inverse elec tromagnetic scattering problem for anisotropic media, Inverse Problems, 26(2010), 074004 (14pp)

  10. [10]

    Cakoni, P

    F. Cakoni, P. Monk, and J. Sun. Error analysis for the finit e element approximation of transmission eigenvalues, Comp ut. Methods Appl. Math., 14(2014), 419-427

  11. [11]

    Colton, R

    D. Colton, R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnet ic Scattering Theory, 2nd ed., Vol. 93 in Applied Mathematic al Sciences, Springer, New York, 1998

  12. [12]

    Colton, P

    D. Colton, P. Monk, and J. Sun. Analytical and computatio nal methods for transmission eigenvalues. Inverse Problem s, 26(2010), 045011

  13. [13]

    Colton, L

    D. Colton, L. P¨ aiv¨arinta, and J. Sylvester. The interior transmission problem . Inverse Problem Imaging, 1(2007), 13-28

  14. [14]

    Chatelin

    F. Chatelin. Spectral Approximations of Linear Operato rs, Academic Press, New York, 1983

  15. [15]

    Hiptmair

    R. Hiptmair. Finite elements in computational electrom agnetism. Acta Numer., 11 (2002), 237-339

  16. [16]

    Q. Hong, J. Hun, S. Shu, and J. Xu. A discontinuous galerki n method for the fourth-order curl problem. J. Comp. Math., 30(2012), 565-578

  17. [17]

    K. Hu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Zhang. Simple curl-curl-conformi ng finite elements in two dimensions, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 42(2020), A3859-A3877

  18. [18]

    K. Hu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Zhang. A family of finite element sto kes complexes in three dimensions. arXiv:2008.03793v1 [math.NA], Aug 2020

  19. [19]

    T. M. Huang, W. Q. Huang, and W. W. Lin. A robust numerical a lgorithm for computing Maxwell’s transmission eigenvalue problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37(2015), A2403- A2423

  20. [20]

    X. Ji, J. Sun, and H. Xie. A multigrid method for Helmholtz transmission eigenvalue problems. J. Sci. Comput., 60(2014), 276-294

  21. [21]

    Kleefeld and L

    A. Kleefeld and L. Pieronek. The method of fundamental so lutions for computing acoustic interior transmission eige n- values. Inverse Problems, 34 (2018), 035007

  22. [22]

    F. Kikuchi. W eak formulations for finite element analysi s of an electromagnetic eigenvalue problem. Scientific Pape rs of the College of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, 38 ( 1988), 43-67

  23. [23]

    F. Kikuchi. On a discrete compactness property for the Ne delec finite elements. J.fac.sci.univ.tokyo Sect. 1A Math, 36(1989), 479-490

  24. [24]

    P. Monk . Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations, Oxford Un iversity Press, Oxford, UK, 2003

  25. [25]

    Monk and J

    P. Monk and J. Sun. Finite element methods for Maxwell’s t ranmission eigenvalues. SIAM. J. Sci. Comput., 34(2012), B247-B264

  26. [26]

    Monk and L

    P. Monk and L. Demkowicz. Discrete compactness and the ap proximation of Maxwell’s equations in R3. Math. Comp., 70(2000), pp. 507-523

  27. [27]

    J. C. N´ ed´elec. Mixed finite elements in R3. Numer. Math., 35(1980), 315-341

  28. [28]

    J. E. Osborn. Spectral approximation for compact operat ors. Math. Comput., 26(1975), 712-725

  29. [29]

    P¨ aiv¨ arinta and J

    L. P¨ aiv¨ arinta and J. Sylvester. Transmission eigenvalues, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 40(2008), 738-753

  30. [30]

    J. Sun. Iterative methods for transmission eigenvalues , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 49(2011), pp. 1860-1874

  31. [31]

    Sun and L

    J. Sun and L. Xu. Computation of Maxwell’s transmission e igenvalues and its applications in inverse medium problems . Inverse Problems, 29 (2013), 104013 (18pp)

  32. [32]

    J. Sun. A mixed FEM for the quad-curl eigenvalue problem, Numer. Math., 132(2016), 185-200

  33. [33]

    W ang, W

    L. W ang, W. Shan, H. Li, and Z. Zhang. H(curl2)-conforming quadrilateral spectral element method for qu ad-curl problems. Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 31(2021), 1951-1986 . 15

  34. [34]

    Xie and X

    H. Xie and X. W u. A multilevel correction method for inter ior transmission eigenvalue problem, J. Sci. Comput. 72(2017), 586-604

  35. [35]

    Y. Yang, J. Han, and H. Bi. Error estimates and a two grid sc heme for approximating transmission eigenvalues. arXiv: 1506.06486 V2 [math. NA] 2 Mar 2016

  36. [36]

    Y. Yang, H. Bi, H. Li, and J. Han. Mixed method for the helmh oltz transmission eigenvalues. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38(2016), A1383-A1403

  37. [37]

    Zhang, L

    Q. Zhang, L. W ang, and Z. Zhang. An H(curl2)-conforming finite element in 2 dimensions and application s to the quad-curl problem. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 41(2019), A1527-A 1547

  38. [38]

    S. Zhang. Mixed schemes for quad-curl equations, ESAIM: M2AN, 52 (2018), 147-161

  39. [39]

    Zheng, B

    B. Zheng, B. Hu, and Q. Xu. A nonconforming element method for fourth order curl equations in R3. Math. Comput., 276(2011), 1871-1886. 16