Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Weighing the Darkness III: How Gaia Could, but Probably Won't, Astrometrically Detect Free-Floating Black Holes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.04648 v1 pith:BCTESHVO submitted 2022-06-09 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gaiastarcompanionaccelerationanotherastrometricastrometricallyblack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The gravitational pull of an unseen companion to a luminous star is well-known to cause deviations to the parallax and proper motion of a star. In a previous paper in this series, we argue that the astrometric mission Gaia can identify long-period binaries by precisely measuring these arcs. An arc in a star's path can also be caused by a fly-by -- the hyperbolic encounter with another massive object. We quantify the apparent acceleration over time induced by a companion star as a function of the impact parameter, velocity of interaction, and companion mass. In principle, Gaia could be used to astrometrically identify the contribution of massive compact halo objects to the local dark matter potential of the Milky Way. However, after quantifying their rate and Gaia's sensitivity, we find that fly-bys are so rare that Gaia will probably never observe one. Therefore every star in the Gaia database exhibiting astrometric acceleration is likely in a long-period binary with another object. Nevertheless, we show how intermediate mass black holes, if they exist in the Solar Neighborhood, could be detected by the anomalously large accelerations they induce on nearby stars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools