Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Formal Definition of Scale-dependent Complexity and the Multi-scale Law of Requisite Variety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.04896 v2 pith:46ZTFQGG submitted 2022-06-10 physics.soc-ph

classification physics.soc-ph
keywords complexitymulti-scalesystemrequisitevarietysystemsashbybehaviors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ashby's law of requisite variety allows a comparison of systems with their environments, providing a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for system efficacy: a system must possess at least as much complexity as any set of environmental behaviors that require distinct responses from the system. However, to account for the dependence of a system's complexity on the level of detail -- or scale -- of its description, a multi-scale generalization of Ashby's law is needed. We define a class of complexity profiles (complexity as a function of scale) that is the first, to our knowledge, to exhibit a multi-scale law of requisite variety. This formalism provides a characterization of multi-scale complexity and generalizes the law of requisite variety's single constraint on system behaviors to a class of multi-scale constraints. We show that these complexity profiles satisfy a sum rule, which reflects a tradeoff between smaller- and larger-scale degrees of freedom, and we extend our results to subdivided systems and systems with a continuum of components.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rational Superautotrophic Diplomacy (SupraAD); A Conceptual Framework for Alignment Based on Interdisciplinary Findings on the Fundamentals of Cognition

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A conceptual framework arguing that AI alignment should be based on negotiated mutual incentives, because autonomy and self-preservation are universal prerequisites of intelligence.

Pith tools