Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

How to use GP: Effects of the mean function and hyperparameter selection on Gaussian Process regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.15081 v1 pith:I36FIGHA submitted 2022-06-30 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords meanfunctionbeenchoicedistanceeffectsfunctionsgaussian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gaussian processes have been widely used in cosmology to reconstruct cosmological quantities in a model-independent way. However, the validity of the adopted mean function and hyperparameters, and the dependence of the results on the choice have not been well explored. In this paper, we study the effects of the underlying mean function and the hyperparameter selection on the reconstruction of the distance moduli from type Ia supernovae. We show that the choice of an arbitrary mean function affects the reconstruction: a zero mean function leads to unphysical distance moduli and the best-fit LCDM to biased reconstructions. We propose to marginalize over a family of mean functions and over the hyperparameters to effectively remove their impact on the reconstructions. We further explore the validity and consistency of the results considering different kernel functions and show that our method is unbiased.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hubble tension: the shape wall

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Late-time modifications to the expansion history can raise H0 by at most about 2% (conservative) to 3.7% (permissive) if the CMB acoustic scale is fixed.

  2. Breaking the Dark Sector Degeneracy with Nonparametric Expansion--Growth Reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Joint nonparametric expansion–growth reconstruction finds no significant dark-sector interaction or dark-energy dynamics, remaining consistent with ΛCDM over 0≲z≲2.

  3. Reconstructing the redshift evolution of Type Ia supernovae absolute magnitude

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Gaussian Process reconstruction finds the Type Ia supernova absolute magnitude is consistent with a constant value, with a redshift-averaged M = -19.456 ± 0.059 that is 3.2 sigma below the SH0ES local calibration.

  4. Probing the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation via Non-Parametric Reconstruction for High Redshifts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Gaussian process reconstruction of the cosmic distance duality parameter eta(z) from BAO, galaxy clusters, supernovae, and quasars finds consistency with eta=1 at the 2-sigma level out to z about 2.33.

  5. Is $\omega_0 \omega_a$CDM a good model for the clumpy Universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Against a Gaussian-process reconstruction of 15 sigma8(z) measurements, the DESI w0waCDM model fits slightly better than LambdaCDM, but the difference is tiny and the comparison metric is biased.

Pith tools