REVIEW 5 cited by
Three-point bounds for sphere packing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We define three-point bounds for sphere packing that refine the linear programming bound, and we compute these bounds numerically using semidefinite programming by choosing a truncation radius for the three-point function. As a result, we obtain new upper bounds on the sphere packing density in dimension 4 through 7 and 9 through 16. We also give a different three-point bound for lattice packing and conjecture that this second bound is sharp in dimension 4.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Linear Programming Bounds for Fibered Sphere Packings
Linear programming bounds are sharp for some fibered sphere packings, collapse to the planar bound in a key six-dimensional case, and fail to prove the Cohn–Rajagopal conjecture for D5/A3.
-
A Three-Point Continuous-Variable Quantum MacWilliams Identity
A three-point continuous-variable quantum MacWilliams identity is constructed, and shown to collapse exactly to the two-point bound for GKP lattice and certifiable bosonic code sectors.
-
On two counterexamples in the geometry of numbers
Rotated E8 yields a strict lattice packing density gain for the product of two 4-balls over D4×D4, and a one-parameter deformation of the densest 9-dimensional lattice lowers its spectral height.
-
Continuous-Variable Quantum MacWilliams Identities
Continuous-variable quantum MacWilliams identities yield quantum Cohn-Elkies and Levenshtein bounds, and conditional optimality of E8/Leech GKP codes.
-
A dual linear programming bound for sphere packing in dimension 36
In dimension 36, a modular-form certificate proves the Cohn–Elkies LP bound exceeds the density of the best known packing by at least a factor of 32.9.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.