REVIEW 1 cited by
Blow-Away in the Extreme Low-Mass Starburst Galaxy Pox~186
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Pox 186 is an exceptionally small dwarf starburst galaxy hosting a stellar mass of $\sim10^5$ M$_{\odot}$. Undetected in HI (M $ < 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$) from deep 21 cm observations and with an [OIII]/[OII]\ (5007/3727) ratio of 18.3 $\pm$ 0.11, Pox~186 is a promising candidate Lyman continuum emitter. It may be a possible analog of low-mass reionization-era galaxies. We present a spatially resolved kinematic study of Pox 186 and identify two distinct ionized gas components: a broad one with $\sigma > 400$ \kmps, and a narrow one with $\sigma < 30$ \kmps. We find strikingly different morphologies between the two components and direct evidence of outflows as seen in the high velocity gas. Possible physical mechanisms driving the creation of high velocity gas seen in [OIII] are discussed, from outflow geometry to turbulent mixing between a hot (10$^6$ K) star-cluster wind and cooler (10$^4$ K) gas clouds. We find a modest mass-outflow rate of 0.022 M$_{\odot}$ \ yr$^{-1}$ with a small mass loading factor of 0.5, consistent with other low mass galaxies. Finally we compare the mass-loading factor of Pox~186 with extrapolations from numerical simulations and discuss possible reasons for the apparent discrepancy between them.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Chemodynamics of Bo\"otesI with $S^{5}$: Revised Velocity Gradient, Dark Matter Density, and Galactic Chemical Evolution Constraints
Boötes I shows a shallow 4σ intrinsic velocity gradient aligned with its orbit, a negative metallicity gradient, and a dark matter profile that weakly favors a cusp over a core.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.