REVIEW 2 cited by
The geometry of genericity in mapping class groups and Teichm\"uller spaces via CAT(0) cube complexes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Random walks on spaces with hyperbolic properties tend to sublinearly track geodesic rays which point in certain hyperbolic-like directions. Qing-Rafi-Tiozzo recently introduced the sublinearly Morse boundary and proved that this boundary is a quasi-isometry invariant which captures a notion of generic direction in a broad context. In this article, we develop the geometric foundations of sublinear Morseness in the mapping class group and Teichm\"uller space. We prove that their sublinearly Morse boundaries are visibility spaces and admit continuous equivariant injections into the boundary of the curve graph. Moreover, we completely characterize sublinear Morseness in terms of the hierarchical structures of these spaces. Our techniques include developing tools for modeling the hulls of median rays in hierarchically hyperbolic spaces via CAT(0) cube complexes. Part of this analysis involves establishing direct connections between the geometry of the curve graph and the combinatorics of hyperplanes in the approximating cube complexes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Periodic quasiflats in hierarchically hyperbolic spaces
Every hierarchically hyperbolic group that is not hyperbolic contains a Z^2 subgroup, and every virtually Z^n subgroup lies in an A-invariant uniform quasi-flat whose points are joined by hierarchy paths.
-
Sublinear Morse Geodesics and First Passage Percolation
If an infinite bounded-degree graph has a sublinearly Morse bi-infinite quasi-geodesic, then first passage percolation almost surely has a bi-infinite geodesic.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.