Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Phishing Detection Via Psychological Trait Scoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.06792 v1 pith:LYP7IHXB submitted 2022-08-14 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords phishingemailsmodelpsychologicalscorestrainingtraitsanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Phishing emails exhibit some unique psychological traits which are not present in legitimate emails. From empirical analysis and previous research, we find three psychological traits most dominant in Phishing emails - A Sense of Urgency, Inducing Fear by Threatening, and Enticement with Desire. We manually label 10% of all phishing emails in our training dataset for these three traits. We leverage that knowledge by training BERT, Sentence-BERT (SBERT), and Character-level-CNN models and capturing the nuances via the last layers that form the Phishing Psychological Trait (PPT) scores. For the phishing email detection task, we use the pretrained BERT and SBERT model, and concatenate the PPT scores to feed into a fully-connected neural network model. Our results show that the addition of PPT scores improves the model performance significantly, thus indicating the effectiveness of PPT scores in capturing the psychological nuances. Furthermore, to mitigate the effect of the imbalanced training dataset, we use the GPT-2 model to generate phishing emails (Radford et al., 2019). Our best model outperforms the current State-of-the-Art (SOTA) model's F1 score by 4.54%. Additionally, our analysis of individual PPTs suggests that Fear provides the strongest cue in detecting phishing emails.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Detection: Evaluating Defensive LLMs Against AI-Generated Social Engineering in Live Turn-by-Turn Interaction

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Defensive LLMs frequently intervene without identifying the right compromised trust component, and sometimes correctly diagnose a failure while still recommending no protective action.

  2. Measuring Modern Phishing Tactics: A Quantitative Study of Body Obfuscation Prevalence, Co-occurrence, and Filter Impact

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A study of 386 verified phishing emails quantifies ten body-obfuscation techniques, their co-occurrence patterns, and their associations with SpamAssassin scores, with text-in-image and Base64 encoding being most prevalent.

Pith tools