Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How Should We Evaluate Synthesized Environmental Sounds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.07679 v1 pith:WOMYTNFO submitted 2022-08-16 cs.SD eess.AS

classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords environmentalevaluationevaluationssubjectivesynthesizedbeenevaluateobjective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Although several methods of environmental sound synthesis have been proposed, there has been no discussion on how synthesized environmental sounds should be evaluated. Only either subjective or objective evaluations have been conducted in conventional evaluations, and it is not clear what type of evaluation should be carried out. In this paper, we investigate how to evaluate synthesized environmental sounds. We also propose a subjective evaluation methodology to evaluate whether the synthesized sound appropriately represents the information input to the environmental sound synthesis system. In our experiments, we compare the proposed and conventional evaluation methods and show that the results of subjective evaluations tended to differ from those of objective evaluations. From these results, we conclude that it is necessary to conduct not only objective evaluation but also subjective evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools