Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Survey on Teleoperation Concepts for Automated Vehicles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.08876 v1 pith:EF6RDXEO submitted 2022-08-18 cs.RO

Domagoj Majstorovic , Simon Hoffmann , Florian Pfab , Andreas Schimpe , Maria-Magdalena Wolf , Frank Diermeyer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords teleoperationautomatedconceptsvehiclesfunctionsliteraturesurveyyears
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In parallel with the advancement of Automated Driving (AD) functions, teleoperation has grown in popularity over recent years. By enabling remote operation of automated vehicles, teleoperation can be established as a reliable fallback solution for operational design domain limits and edge cases of AD functions. Over the years, a variety of different teleoperation concepts as to how a human operator can remotely support or substitute an AD function have been proposed in the literature. This paper presents the results of a literature survey on teleoperation concepts for road vehicles. Furthermore, due to the increasing interest within the industry, insights on patents and overall company activities in the field of teleoperation are presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Safety Blind Spot in Remote Driving: Considerations for Risk Assessment of Connection Loss Fallback Strategies

    eess.SY 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulating connection-loss braking on naturalistic urban traffic scenes yields simulated rear-end collision rates of up to 86 percent, suggesting the standard fallback is a SOTIF-relevant hazard.

Pith tools