Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Online multiple hypothesis testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11418 v3 pith:UX7ZW2ML submitted 2022-08-24 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords onlinecontrolhypothesistestingerrorratetimehypotheses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern data analysis frequently involves large-scale hypothesis testing, which naturally gives rise to the problem of maintaining control of a suitable type I error rate, such as the false discovery rate (FDR). In many biomedical and technological applications, an additional complexity is that hypotheses are tested in an online manner, one-by-one over time. However, traditional procedures that control the FDR, such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, assume that all p-values are available to be tested at a single time point. To address these challenges, a new field of methodology has developed over the past 15 years showing how to control error rates for online multiple hypothesis testing. In this framework, hypotheses arrive in a stream, and at each time point the analyst decides whether to reject the current hypothesis based both on the evidence against it, and on the previous rejection decisions. In this paper, we present a comprehensive exposition of the literature on online error rate control, with a review of key theory as well as a focus on applied examples. We also provide simulation results comparing different online testing algorithms and an up-to-date overview of the many methodological extensions that have been proposed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. False Discovery Control in Multiple Testing: A Brief Overview of Theories and Methodologies

    stat.ME 2024-11 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    This is a survey of false discovery rate control methods, organized into ranking, FDP estimation, and thresholding steps.

Pith tools