REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey of Causal Inference Frameworks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Causal inference is a science with multi-disciplinary evolution and applications. On the one hand, it measures effects of treatments in observational data based on experimental designs and rigorous statistical inference to draw causal statements. One of the most influential framework in quantifying causal effects is the potential outcomes framework. On the other hand, causal graphical models utilizes directed edges to represent causalities and encodes conditional independence relationships among variables in the graphs. A series of research has been done both in reading-off conditional independencies from graphs and in re-constructing causal structures. In recent years, the most state-of-art research in causal inference starts unifying the different causal inference frameworks together. This survey aims to provide a review of the past work on causal inference, focusing mainly on potential outcomes framework and causal graphical models. We hope that this survey will help accelerate the understanding of causal inference in different domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Practical Introduction to Regression-based Causal Inference in Meteorology (I): All confounders measured
Propensity score matching applied to NARR gridded data estimates a positive causal effect of downward shortwave radiation on surface potential temperature after conditioning on geopotential height at three pressure levels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.