REVIEW 1 cited by
Discordant edges for the voter model on regular random graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider the two-opinion voter model on a regular random graph with n vertices and degree $d \geq 3$. It is known that consensus is reached on time scale n and that on this time scale the volume of the set of vertices with one opinion evolves as a Fisher-Wright diffusion. We are interested in the evolution of the number of discordant edges (i.e., edges linking vertices with different opinions), which can be thought as the perimeter of the set of vertices with one opinion, and is the key observable capturing how consensus is reached. We show that if initially the two opinions are drawn independently from a Bernoulli distribution with parameter $u \in (0, 1)$, then on time scale 1 the fraction of discordant edges decreases and stabilises to a value that depends on d and u, and is related to the meeting time of two random walks on an infinite tree of degree d starting from two neighbouring vertices. Moreover, we show that on time scale n the fraction of discordant edges moves away from the constant plateau and converges to zero in an exponential fashion. Our proofs exploit the classical dual system of coalescing random walks and use ideas from Cooper et al. (2010) built on the so-called First Visit Time Lemma. We further introduce a novel technique to derive concentration properties from weak-dependence of coalescing random walks on moderate time scales.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A model of opinion dynamics evolving via a preferential attachment mechanism involving multiple extractions
For a two-opinion preferential-attachment network with multiple sampling and general reinforcement, the normalized opinion count, influence capital and activity converge almost surely to invariant sets of a mean-field...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.