Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Discordant edges for the voter model on regular random graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.01037 v2 pith:AH3WK23C submitted 2022-09-02 math.PR

classification math.PR
keywords timeedgesrandomverticesdiscordantscalewalkscoalescing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the two-opinion voter model on a regular random graph with n vertices and degree $d \geq 3$. It is known that consensus is reached on time scale n and that on this time scale the volume of the set of vertices with one opinion evolves as a Fisher-Wright diffusion. We are interested in the evolution of the number of discordant edges (i.e., edges linking vertices with different opinions), which can be thought as the perimeter of the set of vertices with one opinion, and is the key observable capturing how consensus is reached. We show that if initially the two opinions are drawn independently from a Bernoulli distribution with parameter $u \in (0, 1)$, then on time scale 1 the fraction of discordant edges decreases and stabilises to a value that depends on d and u, and is related to the meeting time of two random walks on an infinite tree of degree d starting from two neighbouring vertices. Moreover, we show that on time scale n the fraction of discordant edges moves away from the constant plateau and converges to zero in an exponential fashion. Our proofs exploit the classical dual system of coalescing random walks and use ideas from Cooper et al. (2010) built on the so-called First Visit Time Lemma. We further introduce a novel technique to derive concentration properties from weak-dependence of coalescing random walks on moderate time scales.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A model of opinion dynamics evolving via a preferential attachment mechanism involving multiple extractions

    math.PR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a two-opinion preferential-attachment network with multiple sampling and general reinforcement, the normalized opinion count, influence capital and activity converge almost surely to invariant sets of a mean-field...

Pith tools