REVIEW 2 cited by
Effects of Different Closure Choices in Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The two-moment method is widely used to approximate the full neutrino transport equation in core-collapse supernova (CCSN) simulations, and different closures lead to subtle differences in the simulation results. In this paper, we compare the effects of closure choices on various physical quantities in 1D and 2D time-dependent CCSN simulations with our multi-group radiation hydrodynamics code Fornax. We find that choices of the 3rd-order closure relations influence the time-dependent simulations only slightly. Choices of the 2nd-order closure relation have larger consequences than choices of the 3rd-order closure do, but these are still small compared to the remaining variations due to ambiguities in some physical inputs such as the nuclear equation of state. We also find that deviations in Eddington factors are not monotonically related to deviations in physical quantities, which means that simply comparing the Eddington factors does not inform one concerning which closure is better.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Non-Newtonian corrections to radiative viscosity: Israel-Stewart theory as a viscosity limiter
The infinite Chapman-Enskog series for radiative shear viscosity is computed exactly for linear incompressible flows, and Israel-Stewart theory with shear-heat coupling is shown to reproduce the resulting non-Newtonia...
-
Advection Algorithms for Quantum Neutrino Moment Transport
A modulus-phase Riemann solver for quantum neutrino moments gives fast-flavor instability growth rates and wavenumbers closer to multi-angle simulations than the prior real-imaginary implementation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.