Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quasi-stellar objects and galaxy mass density profiles derived using the submillimetre galaxies magnification bias

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.17318 v1 pith:RZN25RXI submitted 2022-10-27 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords massdensityinnerouterodotpartprofilessamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this work, we want to exploit the magnification bias of the SMGs using two different foreground samples, quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) and galaxies. Our aim is to study and compare their mass density profiles and estimate their masses and concentrations. The background SMG sample consists of objects observed by \textit{Herschel} with 1.2<z<4.0. The foreground samples are QSOs and massive galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts between 0.2 and 1.0. The cross-correlation measurements are estimated with the Davis-Peebles estimator by stacking the SMG-QSO and SMG-galaxy pairs for the two analysed cases, respectively. This approach allows us to study the mass density profile from $\sim2$ to $\sim250$ arcsec. Moreover, the analysis is carried out by combining two of the most common theoretical mass density profiles in order to fit the cross-correlation measurements. The measurements are correctly fitted after splitting the available angular scales into an inner and an outer part using independent mass density profiles for each region. For the QSOs, we obtain masses and concentrations of $\log_{10}(M/M_{\odot})=13.51\pm0.04; C=6.85\pm0.34$ for the inner part and $\log_{10}(M/M_{\odot})=13.44\pm0.17; C=0.36\pm0.18$ for outer parts. For the galaxy sample are $\log_{10}(M/M_{\odot})=13.32\pm0.08; C=8.23\pm0.77$ and $\log_{10}(M/M_{\odot})=12.78\pm0.21; C=1.21\pm1.01$ for the inner and outer parts, respectively. In both samples, the inner part has an excess in the mass density profile and much higher concentration with respect to the outer part. We obtain similar values for the central mass with both samples, in agreement with those of galaxy clusters results. However, the estimated masses for the outer region and the concentrations of the inner region both vary with lens sample. This could be related to the probability of galactic interactions and/or the different evolutionary stages.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Meta-Calibration of the Cosmic Magnification Coefficient: Toward Unbiased Weak Lensing Reconstruction by Counting Galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Photo-z induced selection biases the cosmic magnification coefficient by factors up to 3, and a Random Forest-based re-calibration of that coefficient yields nearly unbiased convergence reconstructions at bright magni...

Pith tools