REVIEW 1 cited by
Orbit equivalences of pseudo-Anosov flows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We prove a classification theorem for transitive Anosov and pseudo-Anosov flows on closed 3-manifolds, up to orbit equivalence. In many cases, flows on a 3-manifold $M$ are completely determined by the set of free homotopy classes of their (unoriented) periodic orbits. The exceptional cases are flows with a special structure in their orbit space called a ``tree of scalloped regions"; in these cases the set of free homotopy classes of unoriented periodic orbits together with the additional data of a choice of sign for each $\pi_1(M)$-orbit of tree gives a complete invariant of orbit equivalence classes of flows. The framework for the proof is a more general result about \emph{Anosov-like actions} of abstract groups on bifoliated planes, showing that the homeomorphism type of the bifoliation and the conjugacy class of the action can be recovered from knowledge of which elements of the group act with fixed points. As a consequence, we show that Anosov flows are determined up to orbit equivalence by the action on the ideal boundary of their orbit spaces, and more generally that transitive Anosov-like actions on bifoliated planes are determined up to conjugacy by their actions on the plane's ideal boundary: any conjugacy between two such actions on their ideal circles can be extended uniquely to a conjugacy on the interior of the plane.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Sm\"org\aa sbord of (bi)contact structures, Reeb flows and pseudo-Anosov flows
A rigidity theorem for bicontact geometry: a bitransverse Anosov Reeb flow forces the supporting Anosov flow to be skew and isotopically equivalent; the rest of the paper is an open-problem survey.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.