Pith. sign in

REVIEW

EASpace: Enhanced Action Space for Policy Transfer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.03540 v2 pith:N4N73LUQ submitted 2022-12-07 eess.SY cs.ROcs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.ROcs.SY
keywords macroactionsactioneaspaceexpertlearningproposedspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Formulating expert policies as macro actions promises to alleviate the long-horizon issue via structured exploration and efficient credit assignment. However, traditional option-based multi-policy transfer methods suffer from inefficient exploration of macro action's length and insufficient exploitation of useful long-duration macro actions. In this paper, a novel algorithm named EASpace (Enhanced Action Space) is proposed, which formulates macro actions in an alternative form to accelerate the learning process using multiple available sub-optimal expert policies. Specifically, EASpace formulates each expert policy into multiple macro actions with different execution {times}. All the macro actions are then integrated into the primitive action space directly. An intrinsic reward, which is proportional to the execution time of macro actions, is introduced to encourage the exploitation of useful macro actions. The corresponding learning rule that is similar to Intra-option Q-learning is employed to improve the data efficiency. Theoretical analysis is presented to show the convergence of the proposed learning rule. The efficiency of EASpace is illustrated by a grid-based game and a multi-agent pursuit problem. The proposed algorithm is also implemented in physical systems to validate its effectiveness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools