Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Computing the Margin of Victory in Preferential Parliamentary Elections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.00121 v1 pith:22JEK7A2 submitted 2017-08-01 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords electionparliamentaryaustralianelectionsoutcomepreferentialaccusationsalter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show how to use automated computation of election margins to assess the number of votes that would need to change in order to alter a parliamentary outcome for single-member preferential electorates. In the context of increasing automation of Australian electoral processes, and accusations of deliberate interference in elections in Europe and the USA, this work forms the basis of a rigorous statistical audit of the parliamentary election outcome. Our example is the New South Wales Legislative Council election of 2015, but the same process could be used for any similar parliament for which data was available, such as the Australian House of Representatives given the proposed automatic scanning of ballots.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools