REVIEW 1 cited by
An Improved Approximation for Maximum Weighted $k$-Set Packing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We consider the weighted $k$-set packing problem, in which we are given a collection of weighted sets, each with at most $k$ elements and must return a collection of pairwise disjoint sets with maximum total weight. For $k = 3$, this problem generalizes the classical 3-dimensional matching problem listed as one of the Karp's original 21 NP-complete problems. We give an algorithm attaining an approximation factor of $1.786$ for weighted 3-set packing, improving on the recent best result of $2-\frac{1}{63,700,992}$ due to Neuwohner. Our algorithm is based on the local search procedure of Berman that attempts to improve the sum of squared weights rather than the problem's objective. When using exchanges of size at most $k$, this algorithm attains an approximation factor of $\frac{k+1}{2}$. Using exchanges of size $k^2(k-1) + k$, we provide a relatively simple analysis to obtain an approximation factor of 1.811 when $k = 3$. We then show that the tools we develop can be adapted to larger exchanges of size $2k^2(k-1) + k$ to give an approximation factor of 1.786. Although our primary focus is on the case $k = 3$, our approach in fact gives slightly stronger improvements on the factor $\frac{k+1}{2}$ for all $k > 3$. As in previous works, our guarantees hold also for the more general problem of finding a maximum weight independent set in a $(k+1)$-claw free graph.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Approximation algorithms for non-sequential star packing problems
New local search algorithms achieve (1 + k^2/(2k+1))-approximation for k^+-star packing with k≥3, 3/2 for 2^+-star packing, and (1 + 1/(t+1+1/k)) for k^-/t-star packing, improving prior bounds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.