Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Random points are good for universal discretization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12536 v4 pith:GWM3RELS submitted 2023-01-29 math.FA cs.NAmath.CAmath.NA

classification math.FAcs.NAmath.CAmath.NA
keywords discretizationsamplinggoodpointsuniversalresultsfunctionrandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been significant progress in the study of sampling discretization of integral norms for both a designated finite-dimensional function space and a finite collection of such function spaces (universal discretization). Sampling discretization results turn out to be very useful in various applications, particularly in sampling recovery. Recent sampling discretization results typically provide existence of good sampling points for discretization. In this paper, we show that independent and identically distributed random points provide good universal discretization with high probability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a simple greedy algorithm based on those points that are good for universal discretization provides excellent sparse recovery results in the square norm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Some lower bounds for optimal sampling recovery of functions with mixed smoothness

    math.NA 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimal nonlinear sampling recovery of mixed-smoothness classes H^r_q is at least c m^{-r+1/q-1/p} (log m)^{(d-1)/p}, a logarithmic factor not captured by previous lower-bound techniques.

Pith tools