pith. sign in

arxiv: 2302.13924 · v4 · submitted 2023-02-27 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Periodic Korteweg-de Vries soliton potentials generate quasisymmetric magnetic fields

W. Sengupta , N. Nikulsin , S. Buller , R. Madan , E.J. Paul , R. Nies , A.A. Kaptanoglu , S.R.Hudson
show 1 more author
A. Bhattacharjee
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords quasisymmetrystellaratorsKorteweg-de Vries equationsolitonsmagnetic field strengthPainleve propertyplasma equilibriaGardner equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasisymmetric magnetic fields on flux surfaces reduce to periodic Korteweg-de Vries soliton potentials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper links quasisymmetry in stellarator plasmas to the underlying symmetry of solitons by showing that the magnetic field strength B on a flux surface obeys equations from soliton theory. Near the outermost surface, B takes the exact form of the one-soliton reflectionless potential. A non-perturbative argument based on single-valuedness of B directly produces the Painleve property and yields the KdV and Gardner equations. Machine learning applied to many numerically optimized quasisymmetric configurations recovers the same equations from the data.

Core claim

Quasisymmetry arises because the magnetic field strength B on each flux surface satisfies the Korteweg-de Vries and Gardner equations; this follows from the requirement that B remain single-valued, which forces the Painleve property, and is confirmed by the approach of B to the one-soliton reflectionless potential near the outermost surface.

What carries the argument

Single-valuedness of B on a flux surface, which directly enforces the Painleve property and reduces the governing equation for B to the Korteweg-de Vries and Gardner equations.

If this is right

  • The magnetic field strength B possesses a hidden lower dimensionality on each flux surface.
  • An upper bound on the maximum volume of quasisymmetric toroidal plasma can be derived from properties of B alone.
  • The connection length diverges at the outermost surface, indicating a possible X-point or cusp usable for divertor design.
  • Machine learning trained on optimized stellarators consistently recovers the KdV and Gardner equations.
  • Quasisymmetry is generated by the same symmetry principle that permits soliton solutions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Stellarator optimization could be performed in a reduced space by solving the KdV equation on each surface rather than optimizing the full three-dimensional field.
  • The same single-valuedness argument might uncover analogous integrable structures in other plasma confinement symmetries.
  • The divergence of connection length suggests a natural location for magnetic islands or divertor structures without additional engineering.
  • The verified match in the Landreman-Paul configuration indicates the reduction may hold across a broad class of numerically found quasisymmetric equilibria.

Load-bearing premise

Single-valuedness of the magnetic field strength B on a flux surface is enough to force the Painleve property and thereby the KdV and Gardner equations.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of B on flux surfaces of a known quasisymmetric stellarator to test whether its functional form near the outermost surface exactly matches the one-soliton reflectionless potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2302.13924 by A.A. Kaptanoglu, A. Bhattacharjee, E.J. Paul, N. Nikulsin, R. Madan, R. Nies, S. Buller, S.R.Hudson, W. Sengupta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The value of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Prediction of maximum toroidal volume that can be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Radially-summed two-term QS error, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The two-term QS error, summed over the surfaces, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The two-term QS error, summed over the surfaces, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. For a quartic best fit, we plot the coefficient of de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The coefficient of determination on the outermost [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The coefficient of determination as a function of the surface, for three different mean rotational transforms, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. 200 pySINDy models for each shown configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. The value of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. The value of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. The value of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_24.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quasisymmetry (QS) is a hidden symmetry of the magnetic field strength, B, that effectively confines charged particles in a three-dimensional toroidal plasma equilibrium. Here, we show that QS has a deep connection to the underlying symmetry that makes solitons possible. Our approach uncovers a hidden lower dimensionality of B on a magnetic flux surface, which could make stellarator optimization schemes significantly more efficient. Recent numerical breakthroughs (M. Landreman and E. Paul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 035001 (2022)) have yielded configurations with excellent volumetric QS and surprisingly low magnetic shear. Given B, it may be possible to deduce an upper bound on the maximum quasisymmetric toroidal volume which depends only on the properties of B. This has been verified for the Landreman-Paul precise quasiaxisymmetric (QA) stellarator configuration. In the neighborhood of the outermost surface, we show that B approaches the form of the 1-soliton reflectionless potential (I. Gjaja and A. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2413 (1992)). The connection length diverges, indicating the possible presence of an X-point or cusp that could potentially be used as a basis for a divertor. We present a non-perturbative approach based on ensuring single-valuedness of B, which directly leads to its Painleve property and the KdV and Gardner's equations. Finally, we use an approach based on machine learning, trained on a large dataset of numerically optimized quasisymmetric stellarators. We robustly recover the KdV and Gardner's equations from the data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that quasisymmetric magnetic fields arise from periodic KdV soliton potentials. It shows that B approaches the 1-soliton reflectionless potential near the outermost flux surface, that single-valuedness of B non-perturbatively implies the Painlevé property and thus the KdV and Gardner equations, and that machine learning trained on numerically optimized QS stellarators recovers these equations. The approach is verified on the Landreman-Paul precise QA configuration and is argued to imply an upper bound on QS toroidal volume and possible X-points for divertors.

Significance. If the claimed reduction holds, the work would provide an analytical route to QS stellarator design that lowers the effective dimensionality of B on flux surfaces, potentially improving optimization efficiency. The verification against the Landreman-Paul configuration and the ML recovery of the integrable equations constitute reproducible elements that could yield falsifiable predictions for new equilibria.

major comments (2)
  1. [Non-perturbative approach] Non-perturbative approach (abstract and corresponding section): the statement that single-valuedness of B on a flux surface 'directly leads to its Painlevé property and the KdV and Gardner's equations' supplies no intermediate identities. Single-valuedness is satisfied by any smooth toroidal scalar; the derivation must exhibit the precise reduction (via the QS condition |B| = |B|(ψ,θ,ϕ) or an implicit ODE) that selects the integrable hierarchy. This step is load-bearing for the central non-perturbative claim.
  2. [Machine learning section] Machine-learning recovery section: the training set consists of numerically optimized QS stellarators whose construction may already embed symmetry assumptions akin to those recovered. The paper must demonstrate that the recovered KdV/Gardner forms are independent of the optimization priors, e.g., by reporting cross-validation error, out-of-distribution test performance, or an explicit statement that the dataset was generated without KdV-type constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'the connection length diverges' is stated without identifying the surface or coordinate; a parenthetical reference to the relevant flux-surface label would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Non-perturbative approach] Non-perturbative approach (abstract and corresponding section): the statement that single-valuedness of B on a flux surface 'directly leads to its Painlevé property and the KdV and Gardner's equations' supplies no intermediate identities. Single-valuedness is satisfied by any smooth toroidal scalar; the derivation must exhibit the precise reduction (via the QS condition |B| = |B|(ψ,θ,ϕ) or an implicit ODE) that selects the integrable hierarchy. This step is load-bearing for the central non-perturbative claim.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript states the connection from single-valuedness to the Painlevé property and integrable equations without spelling out all intermediate identities. The reduction proceeds by imposing the QS condition |B| = |B|(ψ, θ, ϕ) together with single-valuedness on the toroidal surface, which yields an implicit ODE whose solutions must satisfy the Painlevé property and hence belong to the KdV/Gardner hierarchy. We will revise the relevant section to display these steps explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Machine learning section] Machine-learning recovery section: the training set consists of numerically optimized QS stellarators whose construction may already embed symmetry assumptions akin to those recovered. The paper must demonstrate that the recovered KdV/Gardner forms are independent of the optimization priors, e.g., by reporting cross-validation error, out-of-distribution test performance, or an explicit statement that the dataset was generated without KdV-type constraints.

    Authors: The stellarator equilibria in the training set were generated by standard numerical optimization for quasisymmetry without any explicit KdV or Gardner constraints. To address the concern about possible embedded priors, we will add to the revised manuscript both an explicit statement confirming the absence of such constraints in the dataset generation and quantitative results on cross-validation error together with out-of-distribution test performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a non-perturbative derivation from single-valuedness of B on a flux surface to the Painlevé property and KdV/Gardner equations, plus an ML recovery of those equations from a dataset of numerically optimized QS stellarators. No quoted step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain. The cited 1992 soliton result is used only to identify the limiting form of B, not to justify the central QS-KdV link. The ML step discovers structure in external data rather than renaming a fit. The derivation chain therefore retains independent content against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about toroidal equilibria and single-valuedness of B; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic field strength B must be single-valued on each flux surface
    Invoked to derive the Painleve property and KdV/Gardner equations in the non-perturbative approach

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5870 in / 1087 out tokens · 18508 ms · 2026-05-24T10:03:19.542634+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Since the QS condition has not appeared directly in the form (24c) to the best of our knowledge, let us point out its relation to one of the standard forms of QS

    Equivalence of (24c) and the two-term form of QS We first point out the equivalence of (24c) to the two- term relation. Since the QS condition has not appeared directly in the form (24c) to the best of our knowledge, let us point out its relation to one of the standard forms of QS. To impose QS on the vacuum field, we can use the two-term form (4). We fin...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We shall use normalized variables for the deriva- tions

    Derivation of (31) Next, we focus on the derivation of the ( α, ℓ) deriva- tives. We shall use normalized variables for the deriva- tions. We shall also use the fact that Φ ,z = O(ϵ) from (30). Starting from the relation dℓ B = dx Φ,x = dy Φ,y = dz Φ,z (B4) we find that ℓ = Z dx s 1 + Φ,y Φ,x 2 + Φ,z Φ,x 2 ℓ ≈ Z dx 1 + ϵ2 2 (φ2 ,y + φ2 ,x) = x + O(ϵ2). (B...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Calculation of H(ψ, α) We shall calculate H from the derivatives of B using the expression for H (13), the expression for B (B7) and the (α, ℓ) derivatives (31). Thus, H = 1 + ϵ2 2 φ2 ,y (∂y + ϵη,y∂z) φ,x + ϵ 2 φ2 ,y (1 + ϵφ,x) (∂x + ϵφ,y∂y + φ,z∂z) φ,x + ϵ 2 φ2,y ≈ (φ,xy + ϵφ,yφ,yy) (1 + ϵφ,x)(φ,xx + 2ϵφ,yφ,xy) (B10) = φ,xy φ,xx + ϵ φ,yφ,yy φ,xx − φ,xy φ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (B12) The condition H0+q0 = 0 together with the expression of H0 from (B10) yields the TW solution φ = A = A(ξ, Y ) with ξ = x − q0y, Y = ϵy

    Generalized Bernoulli equation order by order The GB equation (24c) implies −ϵφ,y 1 + ϵφ,x + (H0 + ϵH1)(1 + ϵφ,x) + q0 + ϵηq1 = 0 (B11) Collecting powers of ϵ we get H0 + q0 = 0, (−φ,y + H1 + H0φ,x + ηq1) = 0. (B12) The condition H0+q0 = 0 together with the expression of H0 from (B10) yields the TW solution φ = A = A(ξ, Y ) with ξ = x − q0y, Y = ϵy. Simpl...

    work page

  5. [5]

    We also need to keep both the scales y, Y in ∇2 ⊥, ∇2 ⊥ → ∂2 x + (∂y + ϵ∂Y )2 = ∇2 ⊥ + 2ϵ∂Y ∂y + ϵ2∂2 Y (B16) Finally, we note that (B15) has to be evaluated at z = 1 + ϵη

    Kinematic boundary condition order by order The KBC is obtained from the equation ∇Φ · ∇ψ = 0 with B = ∇Φ, ψ = z − ϵη and is given by φ,z = ϵη,x(1 + ϵφ,x) + ϵ2φ,yη,y (B15) Owing to the fact that φ,z = O(ϵ), we need to evaluate both sides to keep the O(ϵ2) term in φ. We also need to keep both the scales y, Y in ∇2 ⊥, ∇2 ⊥ → ∂2 x + (∂y + ϵ∂Y )2 = ∇2 ⊥ + 2ϵ∂...

    work page

  6. [6]

    ˜B2 ˜B,ξ + 1 6 ∂3 ξ ˜B = 0. (B25) Appendix C: Derivation of the KdV equation for vacuum quasisymmetric B in general geometry We shall first assume complete orthogonality of the (Φs, ψs, αs) coordinates to simplify the calculations in C 1. Then in C 2 we drop the orthogonality requirement. 22

    work page

  7. [7]

    The lower bounds of the integrals in (C1) are arbitrary

    Orthogonal Boozer Coordinates Proceeding under the orthogonality assumption and the other assumptions of Section III B, we now define x = Z dΦs Bs , y = − Z dαs |∇αs| , z = Z dψs |∇ψs| , (C1) ˆt = Bs Bs , ˆy = − ∇αs |∇αs| , ˆz = ∇ψs |∇ψs| . The lower bounds of the integrals in (C1) are arbitrary. For the case of x, this freedom is analogous to the arbi- t...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We choose the orthogonal triad (ˆx, ˆy, ˆz) such that ˆx is aligned with the unit vector ˆt along the magnetic field Bs

    Non-orthogonal Boozer Coordinates We shall now consider generic Boozer coordinates that are non-orthogonal. We choose the orthogonal triad (ˆx, ˆy, ˆz) such that ˆx is aligned with the unit vector ˆt along the magnetic field Bs. Let λ be the angle that characterize the non-orthogonality of the system and is defined by sin 2λ = − ∇ψs · ∇αs |∇ψs||∇αs| . (C1...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Hidden symmetry of vanishing Love numbers,

    Panagiotis Charalambous, Sergei Dubovsky, and Mikhail M Ivanov, “Hidden symmetry of vanishing Love numbers,” Physical Review Letters 127, 101101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Hidden spin-isospin exchange symmetry,

    Dean Lee, Scott Bogner, B Alex Brown, Serdar Elhati- sari, Evgeny Epelbaum, Heiko Hergert, Morten Hjorth- Jensen, Hermann Krebs, Ning Li, Bing-Nan Lu, et al. , “Hidden spin-isospin exchange symmetry,” Physical Re- view Letters 127, 062501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Machine learning hid- den symmetries,

    Ziming Liu and Max Tegmark, “Machine learning hid- den symmetries,” Physical Review Letters 128, 180201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Magnetic fields with precise quasisymmetry for plasma confinement,

    Matt Landreman and Elizabeth Paul, “Magnetic fields with precise quasisymmetry for plasma confinement,” Physical Review Letters 128, 035001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Hidden symmetries in dynamical sys- tems,

    J¨ urgen Moser, “Hidden symmetries in dynamical sys- tems,” American Scientist 67, 689–695 (1979)

    work page 1979

  14. [14]

    The ermakov equation: a commentary,

    Peter GL Leach and K Andriopoulos, “The ermakov equation: a commentary,” Applicable Analysis and Dis- crete Mathematics , 146–157 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Korteweg-de vries superequation as an euler equation,

    V Yu Ovsienko and Boris A Khesin, “Korteweg-de vries superequation as an euler equation,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications 21, 329–331 (1987). 28

    work page 1987

  16. [16]

    Method for solving the korteweg- devries equation,

    Clifford S Gardner, John M Greene, Martin D Kruskal, and Robert M Miura, “Method for solving the korteweg- devries equation,” Physical review letters 19, 1095 (1967)

    work page 1967

  17. [17]

    S Novikov, Sergei V Manakov, Lev Petrovich Pitaevskii, and Vladimir Evgeneviˇ c Zakharov, Theory of solitons: the inverse scattering method (Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 1984)

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    Transport and isomorphic equilibria,

    Allen H. Boozer, “Transport and isomorphic equilibria,” The Physics of Fluids 26, 496–499 (1983)

    work page 1983

  19. [19]

    Theory of plasma confinement in non- axisymmetric magnetic fields,

    Per Helander, “Theory of plasma confinement in non- axisymmetric magnetic fields,” Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 087001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Quasisymmetry,

    Eduardo Rodriguez, “Quasisymmetry,” Ph.D. thesis (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Nikhil Padhye and PJ Morrison, Relabeling symmetries in hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics , Tech. Rep. (Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States). In- stitute for Fusion Studies, 1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    946 (Springer, 2018)

    Gary Webb, Magnetohydrodynamics and fluid dynam- ics: Action principles and conservation laws , Vol. 946 (Springer, 2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Steady plasma flows in a periodic non-symmetric domain,

    Harold Weitzner and Wrick Sengupta, “Steady plasma flows in a periodic non-symmetric domain,” Journal of Plasma Physics 87, 905870603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Jeffrey P Freidberg, Ideal MHD (Cambridge University Press, 2014) p. 302

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Magnetic field strength of toroidal plasma equilibria,

    D. A. Garren and A. H. Boozer, “Magnetic field strength of toroidal plasma equilibria,” Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 3, 2805–2821 (1991)

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    Existence of quasi- helically symmetric stellarators,

    D. A. Garren and A. H. Boozer, “Existence of quasi- helically symmetric stellarators,” Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics 3, 2822–2834 (1991)

    work page 1991

  27. [27]

    Quasi-axisymmetric magnetic fields: weakly non-axisymmetric case in a vac- uum,

    G. G. Plunk and Per Helander, “Quasi-axisymmetric magnetic fields: weakly non-axisymmetric case in a vac- uum,” Journal of Plasma Physics 84, 905840205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Constructing stellarators with quasisymmetry to high order,

    Matt Landreman and Wrick Sengupta, “Constructing stellarators with quasisymmetry to high order,” Journal of Plasma Physics 85, 815850601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    On quasisymmetric plasma equilibria sustained by small force,

    Peter Constantin, Theodore D. Drivas, and Daniel Gins- berg, “On quasisymmetric plasma equilibria sustained by small force,” Journal of Plasma Physics 87, 905870111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Necessary and sufficient conditions for quasisymmetry,

    E. Rodr´ ıguez, P. Helander, and A. Bhattacharjee, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for quasisymmetry,” Physics of Plasmas 27, 062501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Weakly quasisymmetric near-axis solutions to all or- ders,

    E. Rodr´ ıguez, W. Sengupta, and A. Bhattacharjee, “Weakly quasisymmetric near-axis solutions to all or- ders,” Physics of Plasmas 29, 012507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Lectures in plasma physics: the mag- netohydrodynamic approach to the problem of plasma confinement in closed magnetic configurations,

    Claude Mercier, “Lectures in plasma physics: the mag- netohydrodynamic approach to the problem of plasma confinement in closed magnetic configurations,” Luxem- bourg Commission European Communities (1974)

    work page 1974

  33. [33]

    L. S. Solov’ev and V. D. Shafranov, Reviews of Plasma Physics 5 (Consultants Bureau, New York - London, 1970)

    work page 1970

  34. [34]

    Isodynamical (omnigenous) equilibrium in symmetri- cally confined plasma configurations,

    M. P. Bernardin, R. W. Moses, and J. A. Tataronis, “Isodynamical (omnigenous) equilibrium in symmetri- cally confined plasma configurations,” The Physics of Fluids 29, 2605–2611 (1986)

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    Direct construc- tion of optimized stellarator shapes. Part 1. Theory in cylindrical coordinates,

    Matt Landreman and Wrick Sengupta, “Direct construc- tion of optimized stellarator shapes. Part 1. Theory in cylindrical coordinates,” Journal of Plasma Physics 84, 905840616 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Nested toroidal flux surfaces in magneto- hydrostatics. generation via soliton theory,

    WK Schief, “Nested toroidal flux surfaces in magneto- hydrostatics. generation via soliton theory,” Journal of plasma physics 69, 465–484 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Some considerations on closed configu- rations of magnetohydrostatic equilibrium,

    D. Palumbo, “Some considerations on closed configu- rations of magnetohydrostatic equilibrium,” Nuovo Ci- mento B 53, 507–511 (1968)

    work page 1968

  38. [38]

    Anatoly M Kamchatnov, Nonlinear periodic waves and their modulations: an introductory course (World Scien- tific, 2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Korteweg-de vries equation and generaliza- tions. ii. existence of conservation laws and constants of motion,

    Robert M Miura, Clifford S Gardner, and Martin D Kruskal, “Korteweg-de vries equation and generaliza- tions. ii. existence of conservation laws and constants of motion,” Journal of Mathematical physics 9, 1204–1209 (1968)

    work page 1968

  40. [40]

    Korteweg—de vries equation and generalization. III. derivation of KdV and burgers equations,

    C H. Su and C S. Gardner, “Korteweg—de vries equation and generalization. III. derivation of KdV and burgers equations,” J. Math. Phys 10, 536–539 (1969)

    work page 1969

  41. [41]

    Undular bore theory for the gardner equation,

    AM Kamchatnov, Y-H Kuo, T-C Lin, T-L Horng, S-C Gou, Richard Clift, GA El, and Roger HJ Grimshaw, “Undular bore theory for the gardner equation,” Physical Review E 86, 036605 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    PySINDy: A python package for the sparse identifica- tion of nonlinear dynamical systems from data,

    Brian de Silva, Kathleen Champion, Markus Quade, Jean-Christophe Loiseau, J. Kutz, and Steven Brunton, “PySINDy: A python package for the sparse identifica- tion of nonlinear dynamical systems from data,” Journal of Open Source Software 5, 2104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    PySINDy: A compre- hensive python package for robust sparse system identifi- cation,

    Alan A. Kaptanoglu, Brian M. de Silva, Urban Fasel, Kadierdan Kaheman, Andy J. Goldschmidt, Jared Calla- ham, Charles B. Delahunt, Zachary G. Nicolaou, Kath- leen Champion, Jean-Christophe Loiseau, J. Nathan Kutz, and Steven L. Brunton, “PySINDy: A compre- hensive python package for robust sparse system identifi- cation,” Journal of Open Source Software 7...

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    A family of quasi-axisymmetric stel- larators with varied rotational transform,

    Stefan Buller, Matt Landreman, John Kappel, and Rahul Gaur, “A family of quasi-axisymmetric stel- larators with varied rotational transform,” (2024), arXiv:2401.09021 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Direct stellarator coil design us- ing global optimization: application to a comprehen- sive exploration of quasi-axisymmetric devices,

    Andrew Giuliani, “Direct stellarator coil design us- ing global optimization: application to a comprehen- sive exploration of quasi-axisymmetric devices,” (2023), arXiv:2310.19097 [physics.comp-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Asymptotics of reflection- less potentials,

    I Gjaja and A Bhattacharjee, “Asymptotics of reflection- less potentials,” Physical Review Letters68, 2413 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Fake Airy functions and the asymptotics of reflectionlessness,

    MV Berry and CJ Howls, “Fake Airy functions and the asymptotics of reflectionlessness,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 23, L243 (1990)

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    Power and particle han- dling and wall conditioning in ncsx,

    PK Mioduszewski, LW Owen, Donald A Spong, ME Fen- stermacher, AE Koniges, TD Rognlien, MV Umansky, A Grossman, and HW Kugel, “Power and particle han- dling and wall conditioning in ncsx,” Fusion science and technology 51, 238–260 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Stellarator design,

    Allen H. Boozer, “Stellarator design,” Journal of Plasma Physics 81, 515810606 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Simulation of non-resonant stellarator divertor,

    Alkesh Punjabi and Allen H. Boozer, “Simulation of non-resonant stellarator divertor,” Physics of Plasmas 27, 012503 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5113907/16024087/012503 1 online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5113907/16024087/012503 2020

  51. [51]

    Some mathematics for quasi-symmetry,

    J. W. Burby, N. Kallinikos, and R. S. MacKay, “Some mathematics for quasi-symmetry,” Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics 61, 093503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Fluid element relabeling symmetry,

    Nikhil Padhye and Philip J Morrison, “Fluid element relabeling symmetry,” Physics letters A 219, 287–292 (1996)

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    Hamilton’s principle and ertel’s theorem,

    Rick Salmon, “Hamilton’s principle and ertel’s theorem,” 29 in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 88 (American Insti- tute of Physics, 1982) pp. 127–135

    work page 1982

  54. [54]

    Hamiltonian fluid mechanics,

    Rick Salmon, “Hamiltonian fluid mechanics,” Annual re- view of fluid mechanics 20, 225–256 (1988)

    work page 1988

  55. [55]

    Fluid relabelling symmetries, lie point symmetries and the lagrangian map in magne- tohydrodynamics and gas dynamics,

    GM Webb and GP Zank, “Fluid relabelling symmetries, lie point symmetries and the lagrangian map in magne- tohydrodynamics and gas dynamics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40, 545 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    The complete set of Casimir constants of the motion in magnetohydrodynamics,

    Eliezer Hameiri, “The complete set of Casimir constants of the motion in magnetohydrodynamics,” Physics of plasmas 11, 3423–3431 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Guiding center drift equa- tions,

    Allen H. Boozer, “Guiding center drift equa- tions,” The Physics of Fluids 23, 904–908 (1980), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pfl/article- pdf/23/5/904/12463046/904 1 online.pdf

    work page 1980

  58. [58]

    Vacuum magnetic fields with exact quasisymmetry near a flux surface. part 1. solu- tions near an axisymmetric surface,

    Wrick Sengupta, Elizabeth J Paul, Harold Weitzner, and Amitava Bhattacharjee, “Vacuum magnetic fields with exact quasisymmetry near a flux surface. part 1. solu- tions near an axisymmetric surface,” Journal of Plasma Physics 87, 905870205 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    William D D’haeseleer, William NG Hitchon, James D Callen, and J Leon Shohet, Flux coordinates and mag- netic field structure: a guide to a fundamental tool of plasma theory (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Crit- ically balanced ion temperature gradient turbulence in fusion plasmas,

    M. Barnes, F. I. Parra, and A. A. Schekochihin, “Crit- ically balanced ion temperature gradient turbulence in fusion plasmas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 115003 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Omnigenity as gen- eralized quasisymmetry,

    Matt Landreman and Peter J Catto, “Omnigenity as gen- eralized quasisymmetry,” Physics of Plasmas 19 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Helical plasma confinement devices with good confinement properties,

    John R Cary and Svetlana G Shasharina, “Helical plasma confinement devices with good confinement properties,” Physical review letters 78, 674 (1997)

    work page 1997

  63. [63]

    Omnigenity and quasihelicity in helical plasma confinement systems,

    John R Cary and Svetlana G Shasharina, “Omnigenity and quasihelicity in helical plasma confinement systems,” Physics of Plasmas 4, 3323–3333 (1997)

    work page 1997

  64. [64]

    Plunk, Matt Landreman, and Per Helander, “Direct construction of optimized stellarator shapes

    Gabriel G. Plunk, Matt Landreman, and Per Helander, “Direct construction of optimized stellarator shapes. part

    work page

  65. [65]

    omnigenity near the magnetic axis,” Journal of Plasma Physics 85, 905850602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Mapping the space of quasisymmetric stellarators using optimized near-axis expansion,

    Matt Landreman, “Mapping the space of quasisymmetric stellarators using optimized near-axis expansion,” Jour- nal of Plasma Physics 88, 905880616 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Perturba- tive study of the spectrum of large toroidal mode number ideal mhd instabilities,

    TM Antonsen Jr, A Ferreira, and JJ Ramos, “Perturba- tive study of the spectrum of large toroidal mode number ideal mhd instabilities,” Plasma Physics 24, 197 (1982)

    work page 1982

  68. [68]

    Self-healing of confined plasmas with finite pressure,

    B Coppi, A Ferreira, and Jesus J Ramos, “Self-healing of confined plasmas with finite pressure,” Physical Review Letters 44, 990 (1980)

    work page 1980

  69. [69]

    Shear-alfv´ en dynamics of toroidally confined plasmas,

    Richard D Hazeltine and James D Meiss, “Shear-alfv´ en dynamics of toroidally confined plasmas,” Physics Re- ports 121, 1–164 (1985)

    work page 1985

  70. [70]

    47 (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    Mark J Ablowitz, Nonlinear dispersive waves: asymp- totic analysis and solitons, Vol. 47 (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    Exact non- symmetric closed line vacuum magnetic fields in a topo- logical torus,

    Harold Weitzner and Wrick Sengupta, “Exact non- symmetric closed line vacuum magnetic fields in a topo- logical torus,” Physics of Plasmas 27 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Asymptotology,

    Martin Kruskal, “Asymptotology,” in Lectures presented at the Trieste Seminar on Plasma Physics (1965) p. 373

    work page 1965

  73. [73]

    Ordering of two small parameters in the shallow water wave problem,

    Georgy I Burde and Artur Sergyeyev, “Ordering of two small parameters in the shallow water wave problem,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 46, 075501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    The korteweg–devries equation: a sur- vey of results,

    Robert M Miura, “The korteweg–devries equation: a sur- vey of results,” SIAM review 18, 412–459 (1976)

    work page 1976

  75. [75]

    Asymptotic quasisymmetric high- beta three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilib- ria near axisymmetry,

    Wrick Sengupta, Nikita Nikulsin, Rahul Gaur, and Ami- tava Bhattacharjee, “Asymptotic quasisymmetric high- beta three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilib- ria near axisymmetry,” Journal of Plasma Physics 90, 905900209 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Perturbing an axisymmetric magnetic equi- librium to obtain a quasi-axisymmetric stellarator,

    GG Plunk, “Perturbing an axisymmetric magnetic equi- librium to obtain a quasi-axisymmetric stellarator,” Journal of Plasma Physics 86, 905860409 (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    An asymptotic grad-shafranov equation for quasisymmetric stellarators,

    Nikita Nikulsin, Wrick Sengupta, Rogerio Jorge, and Amitava Bhattacharjee, “An asymptotic grad-shafranov equation for quasisymmetric stellarators,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08022 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Existence of weakly quasisymmetric mag- netic fields without rotational transform in asymmetric toroidal domains,

    Naoki Sato, “Existence of weakly quasisymmetric mag- netic fields without rotational transform in asymmetric toroidal domains,” Scientific Reports 12, 11322 (2022)

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    Robert Conte, The Painlev´ e property: one century later (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    278 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    Decio Levi and Pavel Winternitz, Painlev´ e transcen- dents: their asymptotics and physical applications , Vol. 278 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.