Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The W3C Data Catalog Vocabulary, Version 2: Rationale, Design Principles, and Uptake

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.08883 v1 pith:LMLNA6JL submitted 2023-03-15 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords datadcatcatalogsissuesprinciplesrationalerequirementsversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

DCAT is an RDF vocabulary designed to facilitate interoperability between data catalogs published on the Web. Since its first release in 2014 as a W3C Recommendation, DCAT has seen a wide adoption across communities and domains, particularly in conjunction with implementing the FAIR data principles (for findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data). These implementation experiences, besides demonstrating the fitness of DCAT to meet its intended purpose, helped identify existing issues and gaps. Moreover, over the last few years, additional requirements emerged in data catalogs, given the increasing practice of documenting not only datasets but also data services and APIs. This paper illustrates the new version of DCAT, explaining the rationale behind its main revisions and extensions, based on the collected use cases and requirements, and outlines the issues yet to be addressed in future versions of DCAT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring LLM Capabilities in Extracting DCAT-Compatible Metadata for Data Cataloging

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Large language models can generate DCAT-compatible metadata for data catalogs at quality close to human annotations, though the strongest evidence is for simple extraction tasks.

Pith tools