Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Text-to-Image Generation: Perceptions and Realities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.13530 v2 pith:QW6XMFVV submitted 2023-03-10 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords technologygenerationparticipantstext-to-imagecreativedangersemergingonly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative AI is an emerging technology that will have a profound impact on society and individuals. Only a decade ago, it was thought that creative work would be among the last to be automated - yet today, we see AI encroaching on creative domains. In this paper, we present the key findings of a survey study on people's perceptions of text-to-image generation. We touch on participants' technical understanding of the emerging technology, their ideas for potential application areas, as well as concerns, risks, and dangers of text-to-image generation to society and the individual. The study found that participants were aware of the risks and dangers associated with the technology, but only few participants considered the technology to be a risk to themselves. Additionally, those who had tried the technology rated its future importance lower than those who had not.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Voice to Value: Leveraging AI to Enhance Spoken Online Reviews on the Go

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adding LLM-based cleanup and an edit-by-prompt agent to a voice-based review app raised users' willingness to share reviews and their self-reported confidence in a 14-participant field study.

Pith tools