Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying VIO Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.16386 v1 pith:KM6BV53V submitted 2023-03-29 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords driftnoisegaussianperformanceuncertaintyattributionerrorsfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We compute the uncertainty of XIVO, a monocular visual-inertial odometry system based on the Extended Kalman Filter, in the presence of Gaussian noise, drift, and attribution errors in the feature tracks in addition to Gaussian noise and drift in the IMU. Uncertainty is computed using Monte-Carlo simulations of a sufficiently exciting trajectory in the midst of a point cloud that bypass the typical image processing and feature tracking steps. We find that attribution errors have the largest detrimental effect on performance. Even with just small amounts of Gaussian noise and/or drift, however, the probability that XIVO's performance resembles the mean performance when noise and/or drift is artificially high is greater than 1 in 100.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools