Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Pseudorandom Linear Codes are List Decodable to Capacity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.17554 v2 pith:OQLGCV72 submitted 2023-03-30 math.CO cs.DS

classification math.COcs.DS
keywords codesrandomcodepseudorandomlinearpropertiespuncturingsachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We introduce a novel family of expander-based error correcting codes. These codes can be sampled with randomness linear in the block-length, and achieve list-decoding capacity (among other local properties). Our expander-based codes can be made starting from any family of sufficiently low-bias codes, and as a consequence, we give the first construction of a family of algebraic codes that can be sampled with linear randomness and achieve list-decoding capacity. We achieve this by introducing the notion of a pseudorandom puncturing of a code, where we select $n$ indices of a base code $C\subset \mathbb{F}_q^m$ via an expander random walk on a graph on $[m]$. Concretely, whereas a random linear code (i.e. a truly random puncturing of the Hadamard code) requires $O(n^2)$ random bits to sample, we sample a pseudorandom linear code with $O(n)$ random bits. We show that pseudorandom puncturings satisfy several desirable properties exhibited by truly random puncturings. In particular, we extend a result of (Guruswami Mosheiff FOCS 2022) and show that a pseudorandom puncturing of a small-bias code satisfies the same local properties as a random linear code with high probability. As a further application of our techniques, we also show that pseudorandom puncturings of Reed Solomon codes are list-recoverable beyond the Johnson bound, extending a result of (Lund Potukuchi RANDOM 2020). We do this by instead analyzing properties of codes with large distance, and show that pseudorandom puncturings still work well in this regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools