REVIEW 2 cited by
Kernel Selection for Gaussian Process in Cosmology: with Approximate Bayesian Computation Rejection and Nested Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Gaussian Process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic Chronometer data (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), and Gamma Ray Burst (GRB), using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC Rejection, the Mat\'ern kernel with $\nu$=5/2 (M52 kernel) outperformes the commonly used Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel in approximating all three datasets. Bayes factors indicate that the M52 kernel typically supports the observed data better than the RBF kernel, but with no clear advantage over other alternatives. However, nested sampling gives different results, with the M52 kernel losing its advantage. Nevertheless, Bayes factors indicate no significant dependence of the data on each kernel.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probing the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation via Non-Parametric Reconstruction for High Redshifts
A Gaussian process reconstruction of the cosmic distance duality parameter eta(z) from BAO, galaxy clusters, supernovae, and quasars finds consistency with eta=1 at the 2-sigma level out to z about 2.33.
-
Is $\omega_0 \omega_a$CDM a good model for the clumpy Universe?
Against a Gaussian-process reconstruction of 15 sigma8(z) measurements, the DESI w0waCDM model fits slightly better than LambdaCDM, but the difference is tiny and the comparison metric is biased.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.