Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

COOOL: A Learning-To-Rank Approach for SQL Hint Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04407 v1 pith:6PSLJXQS submitted 2023-04-10 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords querycooolplanscostabsoluteapproachescostsdbms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Query optimization is a pivotal part of every database management system (DBMS) since it determines the efficiency of query execution. Numerous works have introduced Machine Learning (ML) techniques to cost modeling, cardinality estimation, and end-to-end learned optimizer, but few of them are proven practical due to long training time, lack of interpretability, and integration cost. A recent study provides a practical method to optimize queries by recommending per-query hints but it suffers from two inherited problems. First, it follows the regression framework to predict the absolute latency of each query plan, which is very challenging because the latencies of query plans for a certain query may span multiple orders of magnitude. Second, it requires training a model for each dataset, which restricts the application of the trained models in practice. In this paper, we propose COOOL to predict Cost Orders of query plans to cOOperate with DBMS by Learning-To-Rank. Instead of estimating absolute costs, COOOL uses ranking-based approaches to compute relative ranking scores of the costs of query plans. We show that COOOL is theoretically valid to distinguish query plans with different latencies. We implement COOOL on PostgreSQL, and extensive experiments on join-order-benchmark and TPC-H data demonstrate that COOOL outperforms PostgreSQL and state-of-the-art methods on single-dataset tasks as well as a unified model for multiple-dataset tasks. Our experiments also shed some light on why COOOL outperforms regression approaches from the representation learning perspective, which may guide future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Training-Free Query Optimization via LLM-Based Plan Similarity

    cs.DB 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-PM, a training-free system that transfers optimizer hints from nearest-neighbour LLM plan embeddings, reports a 21.1% total runtime reduction on JOB-CEB over openGauss.

Pith tools