REVIEW 1 cited by
Untangling Rhetoric, Pathos, and Aesthetics in Data Visualization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In contemporary discourse, logos (reason) and, more recently, ethos (credibility) in data communication have been discussed extensively. While the concept of Pathos has enjoyed great interest in the VIS community over the past few years, its connection to similar but relevant concepts like aesthetics and rhetoric remains unexplored. In this paper, we provide definitions of these terms and explore their overlaps and differences in light of their historical development. Examining the historical perspective offers a deeper understanding of how these approaches in science and philosophy have evolved over time, offering a more comprehensive embedding into the design process and its role within it. Drawing from Campbell's seven circumstances, we illustrate how pathos is being used as a rhetorical device in data visualizations today, at times inadvertently.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Structured Visualization Design Knowledge for Grounding Generative Reasoning and Situated Feedback
A role-annotated guideline scheme makes visualization design knowledge machine-queryable and source-traceable, demonstrated with a 744-guideline catalog and embedding-based analyses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.