REVIEW 1 cited by
Cosmic backreaction and the mean redshift drift from symbolic regression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The possibility of obtaining symbolic expressions for cosmic backreaction is explored through a case study of so-called 2-region models. By using the publicly available symbolic regression algorithm AI Feynman, it is shown that the kinematical backreaction from a single 2-region model can be well described as a function of the mean redshift (or, equivalently, the volume averaged scale factor). A single expression depending on the redshift/scale factor as well as a model parameter, $f$, that can accurately describe the backreaction for a significant range of models is naturally more complicated but is also achieved with percent-level accuracy. \newline\indent Data sets of redshift drift in the 2-region models are also considered. Again utilizing AI Feynman, expressions for the redshift drift are found. In particular, an expression for the difference between the mean redshift drift and the drift of the mean redshift in terms of the kinematical backreaction is easily obtained for a single 2-region model. An accurate symbolic expression that describes this difference for an array of 2-region models is achieved by using the redshift as a feature instead of the kinematical backreaction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine Learning-Based Analytical Expressions for Gray-Body Factors and Application to Primordial Black Holes
Symbolic regression is used to derive compact error-function approximations for Schwarzschild gray-body factors, and the approximations reproduce the Hawking spectra and primordial black hole constraints from full num...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.