REVIEW 1 cited by
Influential Billboard Slot Selection using Spatial Clustering and Pruned Submodularity Graph
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Billboard advertising is a popular out-of-home advertising technique adopted by commercial houses. Companies own billboards and offer them to commercial houses on a payment basis. Given a database of billboards with slot information, we want to determine which k slots to choose to maximize influence. We call this the INFLUENTIAL BILLBOARD SLOT SELECTION (IBSS) Problem and pose it as a combinatorial optimization problem. We show that the influence function considered in this paper is non-negative, monotone, and submodular. The incremental greedy approach based on the marginal gain computation leads to a constant factor approximation guarantee. However, this method scales very poorly when the size of the problem instance is very large. To address this, we propose a spatial partitioning and pruned submodularity graph-based approach that is divided into the following three steps: preprocessing, pruning, and selection. We analyze the proposed solution approaches to understand their time, space requirement, and performance guarantee. We conduct extensive set of experiments with real-world datasets and compare the performance of the proposed solution approaches with the available baseline methods. We observe that the proposed approaches lead to more influence than all the baseline methods within reasonable computational time.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Scalable Submodular Policy Optimization via Pruned Submodularity Graph
SGPO prunes trajectory states via a submodularity graph, then runs a policy gradient update, but its claimed constant-factor guarantee is not proven and conflicts with the paper's inapproximability theorem.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.