Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluation of ChatGPT and Microsoft Bing AI Chat Performances on Physics Exams of Vietnamese National High School Graduation Examination

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04538 v3 pith:BWRN52ZN submitted 2023-06-07 physics.ed-ph

classification physics.ed-ph
keywords chatgptllmsphysicsvietnamesebingchathighstudentsteaching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The promise and difficulties of language model-based approaches for physics teaching were assessed in this study. This study evaluates how well ChatGPT and BingChat, two state-of-the-art (SOTA) large language models (LLMs), perform when answering high school physics questions on Vietnamese exams from 2019 to 2023. When we compared the results of the LLMs with the scores of Vietnamese students, we discovered that ChatGPT and BingChat both perform worse than Vietnamese students, proving that LLMs are not yet capable of fully replacing human intellect in the field of physics teaching. The outcomes also showed that neither LLM is capable of responding to questions at the high application levels. In terms of accuracy, BingChat typically surpassed ChatGPT, although ChatGPT showed more stability. Our research suggests that LLMs can help students and teachers during learning and teaching activities, particularly by offering immediate feedback and individualized learning experiences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal large language models and physics visual tasks: comparative analysis of performance and costs

    physics.ed-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across four image-based physics concept inventories, tested AI models scored between 21% and 81.5% accuracy, and cheaper models often matched or beat far more expensive ones.

  2. LLM Pretraining with Continuous Concepts

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A language model trained to predict and interleave teacher-derived SAE concepts into its hidden states beats plain next-token prediction and knowledge distillation on several benchmarks.

Pith tools