REVIEW 1 cited by
The binomial random graph is a bad inducer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
For a finite graph $F$ and a value $p \in [0,1]$, let $I(F,p)$ denote the largest $y$ for which there is a sequence of graphs of edge density approaching $p$ so that the induced $F$-density of the sequence approaches $y$. We show that for all $F$ on at least three vertices and all $p \in (0,1)$, the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ has induced $F$-density strictly less than $I(F,p).$ This provides a negative answer to a problem posed by Liu, Mubayi and Reiher. Our approach is in the limiting setting of graphons, and we in fact show a stronger result: the binomial random graph is never a \emph{local} maximum in the space of graphons of edge density $p$. This is done by finding a sequence of balanced perturbations of arbitrarily small norm that increase the $F$-density.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The semi-inducibility problem
The authors determine sharp or almost sharp maximum densities for alternating walks and cycles and for every 4-cycle colour pattern in red-blue complete graphs, and exhibit a positive-coefficient quantum graph whose o...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.