Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distribution

As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2306.13047.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2306.13047 v4

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 4 of 4 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00

measured 4 of 4 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T04:46:37.193547Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

1
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 1d56471e-4376-480d-afa5-146a9358c255 · inbound

Do LLMs Give Psychometrically Plausible Responses in Educational Assessments? cites this paper.

Do LLMs Give Psychometrically Plausible Responses in Educational Assessments? Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distribution

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T04:46:37.193547Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T04:46:37.193547Z digest=sha256:0f4c8ff0f622404703b8a384f39c22636fc9e13a5e24d3ca8848a9d7bd3eb49c

Observation 9f0db26f-c409-4abb-87b4-13d2337df714 · inbound

Response-free item difficulty modelling for multiple-choice items with fine-tuned transformers: Component-wise representation and multi-task learning cites this paper.

Response-free item difficulty modelling for multiple-choice items with fine-tuned transformers: Component-wise representation and multi-task learning Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distribution

Reference 116

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-19T20:23:12.924384Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-05-19T20:22:55.750693Z digest=sha256:f90e36832487f6c23c672d9a308a25ed1fd0e8ee381e77768a43b95813bd1e5a

Observation 8ab07a88-4f79-443c-90c9-73c306f1e41f · inbound

A Multi-Agent Framework for Feature-Constrained Difficulty Control in Reading Comprehension Item Generation cites this paper.

A Multi-Agent Framework for Feature-Constrained Difficulty Control in Reading Comprehension Item Generation Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distribution

Reference 73

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T05:58:05.128475Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-05-20T05:57:25.521881Z digest=sha256:28dfd4733a58885c2b371e5060073b525c9c143f766b62421a44071622888191

Observation e0a1b92d-9587-4d36-9d3c-9dab6bcc0641 · inbound

LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment cites this paper.

LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment Analysis of the Cambridge Multiple-Choice Questions Reading Dataset with a Focus on Candidate Response Distribution

Reference 71

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T00:49:18.850620Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-06-26T20:56:40.937381Z digest=sha256:a93ff885ffe39c127ffd2ff50ce17e754beaf99a11f4552cef4369156f6b9e61