Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Sea Change in Software Development: Economic and Productivity Analysis of the AI-Powered Developer Lifecycle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.15033 v1 pith:4TYKLSPQ submitted 2023-06-26 econ.GN q-fin.EC

classification econ.GNq-fin.EC
keywords developersgenerativesoftwareproductivityanalysiscopilotdevelopmentgithub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This study examines the impact of GitHub Copilot on a large sample of Copilot users (n=934,533). The analysis shows that users on average accept nearly 30% of the suggested code, leading to increased productivity. Furthermore, our research demonstrates that the acceptance rate rises over time and is particularly high among less experienced developers, providing them with substantial benefits. Additionally, our estimations indicate that the adoption of generative AI productivity tools could potentially contribute to a $1.5 trillion increase in global GDP by 2030. Moreover, our investigation sheds light on the diverse contributors in the generative AI landscape, including major technology companies, startups, academia, and individual developers. The findings suggest that the driving force behind generative AI software innovation lies within the open-source ecosystem, particularly in the United States. Remarkably, a majority of repositories on GitHub are led by individual developers. As more developers embrace these tools and acquire proficiency in the art of prompting with generative AI, it becomes evident that this novel approach to software development has forged a unique inextricable link between humans and artificial intelligence. This symbiotic relationship has the potential to shape the construction of the world's software for future generations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 11 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. The Impact of Generative AI on Code Expertise Models: An Exploratory Study

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulating the attribution of a mean 39% of added lines to GenAI changes Degree of Expertise values slightly and alters Truck Factor values or rankings in 73% of computed scenarios.

  2. How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI coding agents mostly handle routine, well-scoped development tasks; their pull requests are merged at similar rates and have comparable or lower bug-proneness than human-written pull requests across repository lifecycles.

Pith tools