Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Equal Pay for Similar Work

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.17111 v3 pith:RFZVD4CM submitted 2023-06-29 econ.TH

classification econ.TH
keywords epswequalsimilargenderworkclasspaidprotected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Equal pay laws increasingly require that workers doing "similar" work are paid equal wages within firm. We study such "equal pay for similar work" (EPSW) policies theoretically and test our model's predictions empirically using evidence from a 2009 Chilean EPSW. When EPSW only binds across protected class (e.g., no woman can be paid less than any similar man, and vice versa), firms segregate their workforce by gender. When there are more men than women in a labor market, EPSW increases the gender wage gap. By contrast, EPSW that is not based on protected class can decrease the gender wage gap.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools