Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Can Machines Garden? Systematically Comparing the AlphaGarden vs. Professional Horticulturalists

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.17162 v1 pith:5TXFW4D7 submitted 2023-06-29 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords alphagardenalgorithmshorticulturalistsplantprofessionalautomatedberkeleycompare
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The AlphaGarden is an automated testbed for indoor polyculture farming which combines a first-order plant simulator, a gantry robot, a seed planting algorithm, plant phenotyping and tracking algorithms, irrigation sensors and algorithms, and custom pruning tools and algorithms. In this paper, we systematically compare the performance of the AlphaGarden to professional horticulturalists on the staff of the UC Berkeley Oxford Tract Greenhouse. The humans and the machine tend side-by-side polyculture gardens with the same seed arrangement. We compare performance in terms of canopy coverage, plant diversity, and water consumption. Results from two 60-day cycles suggest that the automated AlphaGarden performs comparably to professional horticulturalists in terms of coverage and diversity, and reduces water consumption by as much as 44%. Code, videos, and datasets are available at https://sites.google.com/berkeley.edu/systematiccomparison.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools