The tension in the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:45VLN4Y3record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
This study aims to elucidate the tension in the Hubble constant ($H_0$), a key metric in cosmology representing the universe's expansion rate. Conflicting results from independent measurements such as the Planck satellite mission and the SH0ES collaboration have sparked interest in exploring alternative cosmological models. We extend the analysis by SH0ES to an arbitrary cosmographic model, obtaining a competitive local $H_0$ determination which only assumes the standard flat $\Lambda$CDM model ($73.14 \pm 1.10$ km/s/Mpc), and another which only assumes the FLRW metric ($74.56 \pm 1.61$ km/s/Mpc). The study also stresses the importance of the supernova magnitude calibration ($M_B$) in cosmological inference and highlights the tension in $M_B$ when supernovae are calibrated either by CMB and BAO observations or the first two rungs of the cosmic distance ladder. This discrepancy, independent of the physics involved, suggests that models solely changing the Hubble flow and maintaining a sound horizon distance consistent with CMB, fail to explain the discrepancy between early- and late-time measurements of $H_0$.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Skipping the rungs! Calibrating distance indicators through their clustering with galaxies
Fisher forecasts show angular cross-correlations between distance indicators and galaxy catalogs can constrain a constant calibration offset to ~0.05 mag and H0 to ~1.81 km/s/Mpc with future LSST+DESI data.
-
Model-independent constraints on generalized FLRW consistency relations with bootstrap-based symbolic regression
Bootstrap-based symbolic regression on supernova and BAO data finds mild 2-4 sigma deviations from FLRW consistency relations, which if real would rule out most FLRW-based solutions to cosmological tensions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.