REVIEW 3 cited by
New Bounds for Matrix Multiplication: from Alpha to Omega
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The main contribution of this paper is a new improved variant of the laser method for designing matrix multiplication algorithms. Building upon the recent techniques of [Duan, Wu, Zhou, FOCS 2023], the new method introduces several new ingredients that not only yield an improved bound on the matrix multiplication exponent $\omega$, but also improve the known bounds on rectangular matrix multiplication by [Le Gall and Urrutia, SODA 2018]. In particular, the new bound on $\omega$ is $\omega\le 2.371552$ (improved from $\omega\le 2.371866$). For the dual matrix multiplication exponent $\alpha$ defined as the largest $\alpha$ for which $\omega(1,\alpha,1)=2$, we obtain the improvement $\alpha \ge 0.321334$ (improved from $\alpha \ge 0.31389$). Similar improvements are obtained for various other exponents for multiplying rectangular matrices.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Asymptotic tensor rank is characterized by polynomials
Sublevel sets of asymptotic tensor rank are Zariski-closed, making the parameter well-ordered in value, complete over the complex numbers, and computable from above.
-
Towards Faster Feasible Matrix Multiplication by Trilinear Aggregation
The paper claims a 44x44 base-case matrix multiplication algorithm with exponent 2.773203, beating Pan's 2.773372, but the proof of the key lemma is flawed.
-
Finding Large Sets Without Arithmetic Progressions of Length Three: An Empirical View and Survey II
For n up to 186 the paper tabulates exact maximum sizes of 3-free subsets, but its headline large-n comparison uses a sphere variant that is not actually 3-free.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.