Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Consideration Set Sampling to Analyze Undecided Respondents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.14333 v1 pith:NP6LTSKE submitted 2023-07-26 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords considerationsetsanalyzemodellingoptionsrespondentssamplingallowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Researchers in psychology characterize decision-making as a process of eliminating options. While statistical modelling typically focuses on the eventual choice, we analyze consideration sets describing, for each survey participant, all options between which the respondent is pondering. Using a German pre-election poll as a prototypical example, we give a proof of concept that consideration set sampling is easy to implement and provides the basis for an insightful structural analysis of the respondents' positions. The set-valued observations forming the consideration sets are naturally modelled as random sets, allowing to transfer regression modelling as

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trojan Horse Prompting: Jailbreaking Conversational Multimodal Models by Forging Assistant Message

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Trojan Horse Prompting injects malicious instructions into a fabricated assistant message in the API chat history, aiming to bypass Gemini's safety filters, but no quantitative evidence is provided.

Pith tools