Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Support

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.15810 v1 pith:LG4XE4KD submitted 2023-07-28 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords supportmentalagentsconversationallanguagelargemodelswell-being
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conversational agents powered by large language models (LLM) have increasingly been utilized in the realm of mental well-being support. However, the implications and outcomes associated with their usage in such a critical field remain somewhat ambiguous and unexplored. We conducted a qualitative analysis of 120 posts, encompassing 2917 user comments, drawn from the most popular subreddit focused on mental health support applications powered by large language models (u/Replika). This exploration aimed to shed light on the advantages and potential pitfalls associated with the integration of these sophisticated models in conversational agents intended for mental health support. We found the app (Replika) beneficial in offering on-demand, non-judgmental support, boosting user confidence, and aiding self-discovery. Yet, it faced challenges in filtering harmful content, sustaining consistent communication, remembering new information, and mitigating users' overdependence. The stigma attached further risked isolating users socially. We strongly assert that future researchers and designers must thoroughly evaluate the appropriateness of employing LLMs for mental well-being support, ensuring their responsible and effective application.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI-Augmented LLMs Achieve Therapist-Level Responses in Motivational Interviewing

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A custom prompt built from machine-learning-identified therapy behavior features improved GPT-4's motivational interviewing quality scores, though the model remained slightly below human therapists on the paper's own metric.

Pith tools