Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MWC 656 is unlikely to contain a black hole

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08642 v2 pith:NYZQDVTL submitted 2023-08-16 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords companionmassstarmsundataemissionlinederive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Context. MWC 656 was reported as the first known Be star with a black-hole (BH) companion in a 60 d period. The mass of the proposed BH companion is estimated to be between 4 - 7 MSun. This estimate is based on radial velocity (RV) measurements derived from the Fe ii 4583 emission line of the Be star disc and from the He ii 4686 emission line, assumed to be formed in a disc around the putative BH. Aims. Using new high-resolution spectroscopic data, we investigate whether MWC 656 truly contains a BH. Methods. We used the cross-correlation method to calculate the RVs of both the Be star and the He ii 4686 emission line and we derive a new orbital solution. We also performed disentangling to look for the spectral signature of a companion. Results. We derive an orbital period of 59.028 +- 0.011 d and a mass ratio q = M_Heii/M_Be = 0.12 +- 0.03, much lower than the previously reported q = 0.41 +- 0.07. Adopting a mass of the Be star of M_Be = 7.8 +- 2.0MSun, the companion has a mass of 0.94 +- 0.34MSun. For the upper limit of M_Be = 16MSun and q = 0.15, the companion has a mass 2.4MSun. Performing disentangling on mock spectra shows that the spectral signature of a non-degenerate stellar companion with such a low mass cannot be retrieved using our data. Conclusions. Our measurements do not support the presence of a BH companion in MWC 656. The derived upper limit on the mass of the companion rather indicates that it is a neutron star, a white dwarf, or a hot helium star. Far-UV data will help to reject or confirm a hot helium-star companion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why do massive stars form bow shocks? Bulk ISM motion as the main driver of bow shock formation and geometry

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bulk interstellar gas motion, not stellar motion, dominates most massive star bow shocks; only about 21% are classical aligned bow shocks.

Pith tools