REVIEW 2 cited by
Admissible pairs and $p$-adic Hodge structures II: The bi-analytic Ax-Lindemann theorem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We reinterpret and generalize the construction of local Shimura varieties and their non-minuscule analogs by viewing them as moduli spaces of admissible pairs. Our main application is a bi-analytic Ax-Lindemann theorem comparing, in the basic case, rigid analytic subvarieties for the two distinct analytic structures induced by the Hodge and Hodge-Tate period maps and their lattice refinements. The theorem implies, in particular, that the only bi-analytic subdiamonds are special subvarieties, generalizing the bi-analytic characterization of special points given in Part I. These results suggest that there is a purely local, $p$-adic theory of bi-analytic geometry that runs in parallel to the global, archimedean theory of bi-algebraic geometry arising in the study of unlikely intersection and functional transcendence for Shimura varieties and more general period domains for variations of Hodge structure.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The completed Kirillov model and local-global compatibility for functions on Igusa varieties
For GL2, cuspidal functions on the ordinary Caraiani-Scholze Igusa variety form a completed Kirillov model of classical cusp forms, and their coinvariants recover Hida-ordinary forms and yield a weak local-global comp...
-
A cohomological smoothness conjecture for moduli of mixed characteristic local shtukas with one leg
For infinite-level EL Rapoport-Zink diamonds, the structure morphism is cohomologically smooth over the non-very-special locus, and a general geometric criterion for that locus is established, with the smoothness conj...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.