Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Preference-based training framework for automatic speech quality assessment using deep neural network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15203 v1 pith:CZ5VSAGF submitted 2023-08-29 eess.AS

classification eess.AS
keywords scoresspeechframeworkqualityrankingtrainingassessmentestimate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One objective of Speech Quality Assessment (SQA) is to estimate the ranks of synthetic speech systems. However, recent SQA models are typically trained using low-precision direct scores such as mean opinion scores (MOS) as the training objective, which is not straightforward to estimate ranking. Although it is effective for predicting quality scores of individual sentences, this approach does not account for speech and system preferences when ranking multiple systems. We propose a training framework of SQA models that can be trained with only preference scores derived from pairs of MOS to improve ranking prediction. Our experiment reveals conditions where our framework works the best in terms of pair generation, aggregation functions to derive system score from utterance preferences, and threshold functions to determine preference from a pair of MOS. Our results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms the baseline model in Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning to assess subjective impressions from speech

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Models trained on comparison category ratings (CCR) achieve better preference-ranking accuracy than models trained on absolute category ratings (ACR) for subjective voice descriptor scoring.

Pith tools