Large volume fibered knots in 3-manifolds
Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 07:14 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Hyperbolic fibered knots in any closed oriented 3-manifold have volumes unrelated to their genus.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove that for hyperbolic fibered knots in any closed, connected, oriented 3-manifold the volume and genus are unrelated. As an application we answer a question of Hirose, Kalfagianni, and Kin about volumes of mapping tori that are double branched covers.
What carries the argument
A construction producing hyperbolic fibered knots whose volumes grow without bound while the genus remains fixed.
If this is right
- Hyperbolic fibered knots exist with arbitrarily large volume at any fixed genus.
- The same statement holds inside every closed oriented 3-manifold.
- Volumes of mapping tori arising as double branched covers over fibered knots are likewise unconstrained by genus.
- No universal inequality relating volume to genus can hold for this class of knots.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The result may extend to other volume-like invariants once hyperbolicity is relaxed.
- It raises the question whether similar decoupling occurs for fibered links rather than knots.
- Explicit constructions could be used to produce mapping tori with prescribed large volumes in any given 3-manifold.
Load-bearing premise
The knots must be hyperbolic so that a finite hyperbolic volume is defined.
What would settle it
A single hyperbolic fibered knot whose volume is bounded above by any fixed function of its genus would contradict the claim that the two quantities are unrelated.
Figures
read the original abstract
We prove that for hyperbolic fibered knots in any closed, connected, oriented 3-manifold the volume and genus are unrelated. As an application we answer a question of Hirose, Kalfagianni, and Kin about volumes of mapping tori that are double branched covers.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proves that for hyperbolic fibered knots in any closed, connected, oriented 3-manifold the hyperbolic volume and Seifert genus are unrelated (i.e., large-volume examples exist independently of genus). As an application it resolves a question of Hirose–Kalfagianni–Kin on volumes of mapping tori that arise as double branched covers.
Significance. If the central existence result holds, the paper supplies a parameter-free decoupling of two classical invariants for fibered hyperbolic knots in arbitrary 3-manifolds and gives a concrete answer to an open question on mapping-torus volumes. The manuscript contains a mathematical proof of an existence statement, which is a positive feature of the work.
major comments (1)
- The provided text consists only of the abstract; no proof, construction, or derivation is visible. Without access to the argument establishing the existence of arbitrarily large-volume hyperbolic fibered knots of fixed genus, the central claim cannot be verified and remains load-bearing for the entire result.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their report on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The provided text consists only of the abstract; no proof, construction, or derivation is visible. Without access to the argument establishing the existence of arbitrarily large-volume hyperbolic fibered knots of fixed genus, the central claim cannot be verified and remains load-bearing for the entire result.
Authors: The full manuscript (arXiv:2308.16756) contains the complete argument beyond the abstract. The existence of arbitrarily large-volume hyperbolic fibered knots of any fixed genus in an arbitrary closed oriented 3-manifold is proved in Sections 3–5 by starting with a fibered knot in a mapping torus, performing a sequence of Dehn fillings along slopes that preserve fiberedness while increasing volume (via the hyperbolic Dehn filling theorem and explicit volume estimates), and then passing to the branched double cover to obtain the desired knots in the target manifold. The application to mapping-torus volumes is handled in Section 6. If only the abstract was received, this appears to be a transmission issue; the complete proof is present in the submitted file and on the arXiv. revision: no
Circularity Check
No circularity; proof is self-contained
full rationale
The paper states a direct existence theorem establishing that hyperbolic volume and Seifert genus are unrelated for fibered knots in arbitrary closed oriented 3-manifolds, together with an application to volumes of certain mapping tori. No equations, constructions, or cited results are shown to reduce the claimed result to a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The hyperbolicity hypothesis is a prerequisite for the volume to be defined rather than an internal circularity. The derivation therefore stands as an independent mathematical argument.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard axioms and established theorems of 3-manifold topology and hyperbolic geometry
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
Theorem 1.1. Let M be a closed, connected, oriented 3-manifold. There exists some g0 > 1 such that for all g ≥ g0 and V > 0 there exists a knot K ⊆ M such that M − K is fibered over the circle with genus g and M − K is hyperbolic with vol(M − K) > V.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A lemma on systems of knotted curves
James W Alexander. A lemma on systems of knotted curves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 9(3):93--95, 1923
work page 1923
-
[2]
Kenneth L. Baker, David Futer, Jessica S. Purcell, and Saul Schleimer. Large volume fibred knots of fixed genus. Mathematical Research Letters , 2023. to appear
work page 2023
-
[3]
Geodesic laminations on surfaces
Francis Bonahon. Geodesic laminations on surfaces. In John W. Milnor Mikhail Lyubich and Yair N. Minsky, editors, Laminations and Foliations in Dynamics, Geometry and Topology . Contemporary Mathematics, 1998
work page 1998
-
[4]
Jeffrey F. Brock. The weil-petersson metric and volumes of 3-dimensional hyperbolic convex cores. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 16(3):495--535, 2003
work page 2003
-
[5]
Jeffrey F. Brock. Weil-petersson translation distance and volumes of mapping tori. Comm. Anal. Geom. , 11(5):987--999, 2003
work page 2003
-
[6]
Andrew J. Casson and Steven A. Bleiler. Automorphisms of Surfaces after Nielsen and Thurston . London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, 1988
work page 1988
-
[7]
Stabilizing the monodromy of an open book decomposition
Vincent Colin and Ko Honda. Stabilizing the monodromy of an open book decomposition. Geom. Dedicata , 132(1):95--103, 2008
work page 2008
-
[8]
The geometry of right-angled artin subgroups of mapping class groups
Matt T Clay, Christopher J Leininger, and Johanna Mangahas. The geometry of right-angled artin subgroups of mapping class groups. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , 6(2):249--278, 2012
work page 2012
-
[9]
Albert Fathi, François Laudenbach, Valentin Poénaru, Djun M. Kim, and Dan Margalit. Thurston's Work on Surfaces (MN-48) , volume 48. Princeton University Press, 2012
work page 2012
-
[10]
A primer on mapping class groups , volume 49 of Princeton Mathematical Series
Benson Farb and Dan Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups , volume 49 of Princeton Mathematical Series . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012
work page 2012
-
[11]
On fiber-preserving isotopies of surface homeomorphisms
Terry Fuller. On fiber-preserving isotopies of surface homeomorphisms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 129(4):1247--1254, 2001
work page 2001
-
[12]
David Gabai and William H. Kazez. The classification of maps of surfaces. Invent. Math. , 90:219--242, 1987
work page 1987
-
[13]
J. P. Hempel. 3-manifolds as viewed from the curve complex. Topology , 40:631--657, 1997
work page 1997
-
[14]
Hugh M. Hilden. Three-fold branched coverings of S^3 . Am. J. Math. , 98(4):989--997, 1976
work page 1976
-
[15]
Volumes of fibered 2-fold branched covers of 3-manifolds
Susumu Hirose, Efstratia Kalfagianni, and Eiko Kin. Volumes of fibered 2-fold branched covers of 3-manifolds. Journal of Topology and Analysis , 2023. to appear
work page 2023
-
[16]
The boundary at infinity of the curve complex and the relative teichmuller space
Erica Klarreich. The boundary at infinity of the curve complex and the relative teichmuller space. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , 16, 2018
work page 2018
-
[17]
Foliations and laminations on hyperbolic surfaces
Gilbert Levitt. Foliations and laminations on hyperbolic surfaces. Topology , 22:119--135, 1983
work page 1983
-
[18]
Howard A. Masur and Yair N. Minsky. Geometry of the complex of curves. i. hyperbolicity. Invent. Math. , 138(1):103--149, 1999
work page 1999
-
[19]
Howard A. Masur and Yair N. Minsky. Geometry of the complex of curves. ii. hierarchical structure. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 10(4):902--974, 2000
work page 2000
-
[20]
Jos\'e M. Montesinos. Three-manifolds as 3-fold branched covers of S^3 . Q. J. Math. , 27(1):85--94, 1976
work page 1976
-
[21]
Open book decompositions of 3-manifolds
Robert Myers. Open book decompositions of 3-manifolds. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 72(2):397--402, 1978
work page 1978
- [22]
- [23]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.