Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distinguishing Neural Speech Synthesis Models Through Fingerprints in Speech Waveforms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06780 v2 pith:KLEGPH5C submitted 2023-09-13 cs.SD eess.AS

classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords speechfingerprintsacousticmodelwaveformssynthesisvocoderapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent strides in neural speech synthesis technologies, while enjoying widespread applications, have nonetheless introduced a series of challenges, spurring interest in the defence against the threat of misuse and abuse. Notably, source attribution of synthesized speech has value in forensics and intellectual property protection, but prior work in this area has certain limitations in scope. To address the gaps, we present our findings concerning the identification of the sources of synthesized speech in this paper. We investigate the existence of speech synthesis model fingerprints in the generated speech waveforms, with a focus on the acoustic model and the vocoder, and study the influence of each component on the fingerprint in the overall speech waveforms. Our research, conducted using the multi-speaker LibriTTS dataset, demonstrates two key insights: (1) vocoders and acoustic models impart distinct, model-specific fingerprints on the waveforms they generate, and (2) vocoder fingerprints are the more dominant of the two, and may mask the fingerprints from the acoustic model. These findings strongly suggest the existence of model-specific fingerprints for both the acoustic model and the vocoder, highlighting their potential utility in source identification applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Source Tracing of Synthetic Speech Systems Through Paralinguistic Pre-Trained Representations

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Paralinguistic speech representations, especially TRILLsson, are the most effective single features for tracing synthetic speech to its source generator, and the TRIO fusion with x-vector reports new accuracy highs.

  2. Investigating Prosodic Signatures via Speech Pre-Trained Models for Audio Deepfake Source Attribution

    eess.AS 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    x-vector embeddings and a Rényi divergence fusion loss achieve the best audio deepfake source attribution on ASVspoof 2019 and CFAD, though the benchmark protocol is non-standard.

Pith tools